Hi so you will have seen 100s of videos and post about the dcv we no what bungle say and we no what the community say about if the dcv and bungles new plans r right or wrong but just for a second lets forget what bungle says what we have ben saying and look at the moral and ethical view so i ask you do you think what bungle is doing is unethical or emoral a lot of business r saying it is and you no the reson we have ethicass and morals is so we no right form wrong
-
Dumb post.
-
7 RepliesWould be unethical if you were not told about it. You were. Learn punctuation.
-
-
4 RepliesRead the "End User Licence Agreement" and then delete this post. Refrain from making posts like this again.
-
1 ReplyI'm mad Netflix took a movie off of their site that I paid for too.
-
3 RepliesThis man needs a different kind of DCV: Dictionary, Commas and verbs.
-
2 RepliesUnethical......No Unfortunate......Yes But required to keep the games progressive story narrative and to keep game size manageable and focused.
-
2 RepliesWhat is it with the Destiny community and reading? Have most of the Destiny fans trouble with reading?
-
Trying to read your post is unethical.
-
6 RepliesI’m pretty sure that in the giant doc we click accept on to play the game for the first time it says that they can make any changes to the content included in the game at any time. I know a lot of games do this. Does it succ? Yes Is it frustrating? Yes Should Bungie do it? Probably not Is it Unethical? Nope
-
Just…rambling. If English isn’t your first language that’s fine, but use some kind of program to check grammar and spelling before you post. The internet is unforgiving.
-
2 RepliesWhat really matters is that the way Bungie's content is temporary and monetized makes the game utterly not worth paying anything for because everything you pay for is VERY temporary. Ethical or not, it's not worth a dime as long as stuff is being cycled out regularly. If I'm going to pay for something, I'm going to expect to keep it.
-
10 RepliesTerms say that Bungie can change/remove content as they please. You agreed to those terms, so…
-
4 RepliesNot an ethical issue, however it's their fault for sticking with the D1 engine that's beefed up but still busting at the seams.[spoiler]Also I hope english isn't your primary language.[/spoiler]
-
1 ReplyOkay now do you want to try to present that so you don’t look like a jabbering mental patient?
-
1 ReplyAwesome ratio there, also L
-
12 RepliesThe Destiny Defenders will mob you if you criticize their game. I like Destiny a lot and will continue playing it, maybe less because other games coming out this month that interest me more, but I'll still try to keep up on it. That being said, I do think it's unethical whether it's written in the terms of service or not. Same day loan companies have everything stated in their terms of service as well, but what they do is unethical and they prey on poor people. However I think you have a valid question, but a lot of the destiny defenders will attack you personally rather than explain why they don't think it's unethical. English is obviously a second language for you but I see a lot of comments attacking that, which says more about them than it does you.
-
7 RepliesThey temporarily took older stuff out to rework and to make room for new stuff. Wow the horror. Get over it.
-
Stay in school kid…
-
Grammar & paragraphs Trying to get us to read that awful block of word vomit is immoral
-
2 RepliesIt's the best way for them to continue supporting D2. Bungie tried incentivizing people to play older destinations thru quests and leveling. People hated it, "I don't want to play the old stuff", and so Bungie tried to move on from the old content. Next thing you know, it takes four patches to fix the izanagi's burden quest and old content is bugging out hardcore, requiring Bungie to take time from new stuff to fix it. Following the reaction to people not wanting to play older content, they found it best to just vault older content to save them development time.
-
7 RepliesIt’s not an ethical issue. Someone isn’t behaving unethically simply because you don’t like what they are doing, and people didn’t bother to learn what their money actually bought them. The DCV is necessary so that the game can continue to run properly on outdated, underpowered last-gen consoles. Without it, the game would wind up like Cuberpunk 2077 did. It would run well on pc, but would be unplayable on PS4 and XB1. So the choice is to either hold onto old stuff in a dead game… or let go of the old stuff so that we can continue to have new stuff.
-
7 RepliesGive it up, Knightrider20908. We know this is you on an alt.
-
4 RepliesGood lord, throw a comma or period in once and a while.
-
4 RepliesEdited by Jays Desafio: 2/20/2022 11:31:03 PMI do not want a 400gb game on my PC. Let them vault stuff, they should also get rid of a bunch of useless stuff currently in game to help with FPS if you ask me.
-
Man that sure is a ratio