{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Modificato da Soatok:
10/26/2019 5:36:49 AM
71
Gambit without Invasions (or any PvP at all) would be perfection
Seriously: A non-PvP Gambit mode which consists [i]entirely[/i] of competitive PVE (who can get the primeval summoned and burned quicker?) would be so much more pleasant than what we have today.
It would give dedicated PVE players a chance to compete in gear races without having to suffer through PvP.
EDIT: Since this has caused a tiny bit of confusion...
I'm not saying "change Gambit for everyone". I'm saying a "no invader" mode should be a valid option for PVE players who want powerful rewards during week one of a season and are otherwise forced to do PVP.
Ideally, you should be able to do endgame PVE without ever having touched a PVP mode in your life.
Cooperative > Competitive
-
5 RisposteThat would ruin the concept of Gambit. Gambit is meant to be a PvP and PvE hybrid. If you want soley PvE there are tons of strikes, menagerie and even vex offensive to name stuff off the top of my head. Gambit should retain it's identity. If you're strugging in gambit because of invaders either A. You ignore the invader B. Your team doesn't know how to PvP very well C. You aren't very good at evading the invader D. The invader is a PvP god All of which means that the invader deserves those kills. That's the harsh reality, but that's what gambit is all about
