{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Este hilo está inspirado en este otro: ver publicación original
Editado por dazarobbo:
12/7/2016 1:51:50 PM
33
A question for everyone to answer
There is a topic you strongly believe in which you believe is correct. However, not everyone is interested in what you are saying or they don't believe you.
You have been permitted a chance to write one last report on this topic which will be read by many people.
Your previous attempts to convince people by giving them the true evidence has failed, but you now have an opportunity: if you falsify the evidence, you will be able to win-over support for your topic, and nobody will ever know what you did.
What do you do?
English
#Offtopic
-
Editado por Zonda: 12/8/2016 1:09:06 PMAs much as I'd want to manipulate the evidence for the sake of my argument, I think I'd go with the honest truth in the report. Anybody worth winning over will read it thoroughly and make a decision based on the data presented to them, and the others can continue being armchair experts for the rest of their lives. There's also the possibility, as Prototape said, that my viewpoint is proven wrong further down the track. I'd rather not be one of the sensationalist media outlets that I loathe, and I'd definitely not want to lead even more people down the wrong track from that decision. By presenting the data as-is, any flaws can easily be found in proof reading without the need for extensive cross-referencing.
