Sadly, a lot of Americans are uninformed about everything and just go with the mainstream, pro choice, for gay marriage, and things like that, and some might just even vote for Hillary for first female president

This one has predicted every winner since Reagan and it says Hillary will win. Which is right? We'll find out on Tuesday.

It doesn't take a supercomputer to tell you that Clinton is part of the Bilderberg Group so it was already decided from the start.

Inb4 computer is rigged/hacked by the Clintons

If your trying to overcome racial and sexual prejudice getting it done quickly is better here. Elect a black and woman back to back and break the trend.

Here is the full version: [url]http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/28/donald-trump-will-win-the-election-and-is-more-popular-than-obama-in-2008-ai-system-finds.html[/url] What the algorithm is doing is basically allocating weight-age points to frequency of occurrence. This might work in general, but would not be dependable in cases of anomalies - like if someone were infamous, and points gathered would not be accurate if hunting for a 'beloved' entity. And AI is not advanced in current time to analyze irony, sarcasm, parody, or general denial without a single 'negative' dictionary input used. It does say in the post: [quote]But the entrepreneur admitted that there were limitations to the data in that sentiment around social media posts is difficult for the system to analyze. Just because somebody engages with a Trump tweet, it doesn't mean that they support him. Also there are currently more people on social media than there were in the three previous presidential elections.[/quote] Also I don't think it is mentioned in the article, but I personally feel the program might have additional higher weight points associated with legacy factors like anti incumbency. etc. [b]Edit: 3rd spoiler in case things weren't clear.[/b] [spoiler]Not knocking on one candidate or the other. What I'm trying to say is this manner of prediction is thrown off balance when notoriety and irregular sampling comes into play. Check offtopic here for instance - more or less the same set of users churn out political threads at much higher frequency than say, some dude posting about how the day went for him at work. [/spoiler] [spoiler]Have zero stake on either side and am not talking out of my a** - being computer science dude who's been working in programming and developing CRM and OM systems for over 10 years now (industry leading/multi Billion/even Big 4 and in turn their fortune 100 clients gets these systems developed for use in house (read ISPs to Energy giants to Automotive leaders using telematics, as few examples of verticals among many more just saying). And....(like a big AND) - the proprietary predictive analytics software some have developed and are putting to use - would blow this AI mentioned in the article out of the water. Simply because there is 0 bias or 100% bias of revenue involved when using these in house predictive analytics software.[/spoiler] Spolier 3: -[spoiler] Bottom line: Just because set of 'passionate' users mention one candidate's name more often (and at much higher frequency than average Joe/Jane) - it does not compute to actual results when each person can only choose once/vote once in the real world. A guy spamming social media 400 times will vote once same as someone who turned off his computer. Pen and paper model - actually asking people (and the higher and wider sample size the better) would yield better/more accurate predictions. Thus regular polls still have an edge in accuracy over predictive analytics that use social media as data point)[/spoiler]

It doesn't take a computer to see that Clinton is clearly going to win lol

Atari 2600 like her servers. Im not worried about what atari said. Trump for the win! Plus the weiners are exposed now with laptop email scandal!

I'd hardly consider accurate after just 3 correct predictions. Hillary has the means to win the election no matter how many people vote for her.

Trumps only chance is if they find some really bad crap in those emails around tomorrow

Sorry to say this but there's no hope left for trump.

Lol, it used social media. Trust me, I despise Hillary, but if, say for example, bernie sanders were a nominee, it'd say he's going to win due to the overwhelming amount of support he had on social media. Lots of kids who don't know what they're talking about on the internet.

I honestly believe it will be a Trump landslide. Everyone voting for Hillary is taking part in all these "non-official-poll-polls" and are all over social media and such, so everyone who is going to vote is already accounted for. Trump will rally up everyone who doesn't do all of that. More people who either haven't voted before, or haven't cared about politics, will be involved. That's why Trump will win.