{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/2/2015 3:34:48 AM
317
When people say the Boolean Gemini sucks..
Maybe your the one who sucks
-
What was that video lol. No offense but that's not enough to support your argument. It was two kills from behind.
-
1 OdpowiedźTlaloc is waayyy better #warlockscoutrifle
-
Tlaloc master race
-
9 OdpowiedziDoesn't even compare to MIDA
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika NightSoldier85: 10/3/2015 12:17:09 AMLol you got two kills that took like 6-8 shots each
-
You're*
-
It doesn't suck but it doesn't blow either
-
1 OdpowiedźBoolean is great
-
I'll stick with my tlaloc
-
5 OdpowiedziNo way?!?! Did you just get 2 kills? Wow!!! Omg I could never do that with any other weapon
-
You're**
-
Ok I suck so I'm not one to talk.....but both of those kill had their back to you......soooo
-
2 OdpowiedziYou have to be the biggest scrub on here! #gitgud
-
3 OdpowiedziUmmm... it does suck. 7 shots for the first kill... 8 shots for your second kill. Nice job. Suros DIS-43... much better.
-
last extremity. then you will know power.
-
2 Odpowiedziyou only killed two people????? no crit either. git gud???
-
Uhhhhh i got my first phantom medal with one... boolean is beast.
-
No one cares that you killed 2 people with it in crucible without even hitting a headshot
-
Just got mine :)
-
2 OdpowiedziWow two kills in the back! Such a valid point, could you elaborate a little otherwise you just don't have enough proof..
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika Purple389YW: 10/2/2015 9:20:11 PMIf you are going to prove the gun is good I will kindly ask if you could show us the footage for the match from beginning to end. I also want to know how good it will be if i directly engage someone and win. Not shooting them in the back because that is not going to be every situation. Also that still does not convince me to want to use it.
-
1 OdpowiedźYou shot 2 people in the back -.- No offense but this is nothing groundbreaking. You could have been using a rare sidearm and got those kills.
-
Infused it into my Red Death; best choice ever.
-
2 OdpowiedziThat's it? Maybe you coulda got a 5 kill streak. Or triple or double down. Maybe a phantom medal or something.but 2 kills from shooting people in the back says nothing to me. Sorry pleb
-
6 OdpowiedziYou didn't show how or why the weapon was good. You could have done that with a blue scout rifle. Generally highlights showing why a weapon is good have more than 2 kills. They also are supposed to show you facing off against another weapon head to head, and you win. Or generally show you utilizing the exotic perk(s) while going on a rampage. Whether that be you using the Agility perk, or the Armor perk on this specific weapon. To be honest, I'm not sure if your post was serious or if you meant to post an entirely unspectacular video and troll for comments. I tend to lean towards that your post was serious and all you need is a little help understanding what kind of footage emphasizes the benefits of a weapon. Hopefully this helped you get there and your future posts will be a little more relevant and informative.
-
I don't understand how what you did was good..?
