{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/5/2015 6:59:29 PM
1
The only jump that even remotely competes with blink is increased control on a titan. Even then, it's nothing like blink. I can run away faster than I can warlock float or try to triple jump away. The other jumps provide extremely mediocre methods of escape.
English
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 7:03:01 PMLike I said... You'd be surprised. Whenever I play as both, I usually escape Danger. Not my fault people don't know how to properly escape danger... :shrugs: And so you want people to get hurt from using a jump ability? Come on now...
-
I don't think I'd be surprised. Theres not a lot I haven't seen in crucible. Also, I didn't say you can't escape with regular jumps. I said blink allows you to do It infinitely better.
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 7:13:59 PMNot really, it just has the Iframes, I usually lead my shots when they do blink. I still don't think Blink deserves to be nerfed to wear it damages the user... That's just... Terrible.
-
Until you provide a better solution, that's what I'm going with
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 9:31:01 PMRiiiggghhhttt... Because damaging a user when he Blinks is totallyyy a "better" solution... Hell I even provided a great solution(Which you've ignored multiple times now) that benefits all parties while you, instead, thought up a "solution" that brought damaging defects... To a jump ability... And your only reasoning for it is "Blink uses a lot of energy, so it should"... No... It shouldn't. :/
-
The only solution you have fixed blink shotgunning. That's it. I'm not saying that since blink uses so much energy it damages you. I'm saying that could be the "lore" behind it damaging you rather than bungie just saying "yea it damages you now". Again, several other people agreed with me and so far you're the only one to disagree.
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 9:49:56 PMSeveral other people? Ehhh, that's pushing it... Don't you mean the two who 'sorta' agreed with you but still think it as flawed? Hell one of them didn't even say he agreed with you, he simply said it was "unique", nothing else. And my solution didn't just solve Blinkshotgunning, it also solve the fact that you have I frames while using it.... And changing the lore or not, it's still rather flawed. And there's not a snowball chance in hell that Bungie is gonna change a Jump Ability to damage people (Thank god). Especially since you said "Blink Strike technically isn't Blink" hahaha. So lemme get this straight, you want people to get damaged by Blink and you want the lore behind it to change so that it explains that Blink damages it's user since it uses a lot of energy? Even though all of our classes can literally call forth and infuse our bodies with three powerful elements and such... And you don't want Blink Strike to damage people because you think that "Blink Strike isn't technically Blink", even though Blink is literally in the name of Blink Strike... Are you serious?
-
Get this in your head: IT WAS MY SUGGESTION. I would still use blink under my revised blink. I would still perform well. If you don't think you would then ok. You disagree with me.
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 10:16:32 PMNah, I think I would... I like using Blink, but the fact you made a crappy and flawed suggestion such as damaging players... While using a jump ability. Nah, I'm beyond disagreeing with you... I think your suggestion is incredibly... Stupid. To be honest. :/
-
I personally don't think it was stupid. Then again, it was my idea.... I don't care if they fix it or leave it alone. I'm a go with the flow kind of guy.
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 10:20:41 PMSo you like the Meta then? And yeah, it was rather stupid especially when you said that part about Blink Strike technically not being blink... I lost my shit there hahaha XD
-
I'm indifferent about the meta. When a new meta comes to exist, I'll adjust and abuse it. Couldn't care less. As for blink strike, it technically isn't the same thing as blink.
-
Uh huh... Sure dude, so by your logic, then it should damage the person who uses Blink Strike melee. Dude seriously... How the -blam!- can you say Blink Strike technically isn't Blink when it *has Blink literally in it's name*? 😂😂😂 Another thing... Yup I figured you were a Meta abuser... Which makes this all ironic... You abuse stuff and yet you don't want things to be abused on you and you want them to have idiotic nerfs and such huh?
-
I never said anything needed a nerf. I explicitly stated I don't care if anything is nerfed. If blink strike = blink... Why don't we all go blink striking around the map for transportation and evasiveness?
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 10:59:39 PMThen why care so much about people who agree with you? And what? Why won't we go Blinking around the map if we melee? Well for one thing, Blinking is ripping a hole in space to leap from point to point. Blink Strike is a shorter form of it and Hunters are using momentum from Blinking a short distance to stab someone. Duh. It's just common sense.
-
I was simply providing my input on how it could be fixed
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 11:27:25 PMBut you kept mentioning the very few who "sorta" agreed with you when I said it was a shitty suggestion.
-
Right. So how is that relevant?
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 11:33:10 PMI dunno, you tell me. You were the one who kept mentioning them as if it meant that you thought it would give your flawed suggestion any merit (It doesn't). It was rather irrelevant to mention them that many times.
-
It does have merit though. You're the lone guy in the middle of a bunch of other guys with opinions opposite of yours.
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika john_osborne: 9/5/2015 11:43:54 PMHmmm... Not exactly... You're the lone guy who kept randomly choosing how many people agreed with you, first it was 5-6, then it turned to 6, then 7... When all you had was two people who "sorta" agreed with you but were still iffy oabout your crappy suggestion. And a third one who only said it was unique, nothing more. Nothing less. And you said that Blink Strike isn't technically Blink. And you failed to mention how those people who "agreed" with you were relevant. Seems I've gotten more merit out if this than you dude... A good laugh or two.
-
I only ever remember saying 5-6... You're changing it for me.
-
[quote]The only solution you have fixed blink shotgunning. That's it. I'm not saying that since blink uses so much energy it damages you. I'm saying that could be the "lore" behind it damaging you rather than bungie just saying "yea it damages you now". Again, *several other people agreed with me* and so far you're the only one to disagree.[/quote] 😂😂😂
-
No. You said 7 afterwords. You're changing it yourself. Do you have memory problems?
-
I scrolled through every post. None said seven. Perhaps I don't have memory problems. Maybe you just can't read.
