{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/20/2015 3:03:41 PM
239
Bungie Don't You Think Enough Guardians Hate 2.0 To Change It!!!!
I have heard people say they are ok with it. That's fine for them but let's be honest enough of us don't like it to change it. I get you want us to use the new weapons in TTK. Just don't take away the epic stories we have of how we got and upgraded our prized exotics to 365.
English
#Destiny
-
Ma mutha -blam!-in finallll roooooounnnnd nooooooooooooooo
-
Wait ... Wha?
-
I really feel like bungie did a decent job with the patch. Thorn and last word definitely need it. Gjallarhorn not so much and icebreaker maybe a tad of a nerf but not a whole 18 second increase for a full icebreaker mag. Black hammer was a legendary with and exotic like white nail perk and honestly it either needed to be nerfed or made into am exotic. Legendary hand cannons are fine where they are in my opinion. Auto rifles are receiving a much needed buff. But God why did they touch my hawkmoon? :(
-
2.0 is out already? But the guns seem perfectly the same as before! How can I make such an informed opinion when the guns all feel the same?[spoiler]oh, i see what you did there[/spoiler]
-
1 OdpowiedźJust because it's popular doesn't mean it's the right choice.
-
1 OdpowiedźHey if nerfing thorn, tlw, and final round means the complete destruction of ghorn, icebreaker, and black hammer then...BYE BYE to my Gally! I am super duper excited for this patch, and so is my clan. We hate having to use final round to teach final rounders a lesson, I can't wait to delete my Spear
-
Honestly I want them to move forward and the only change there is that i hate personally is the icebreaker nerf, I got it in crucible and the 5 second wait time is already appropriate I don't think it needs to be longer. 30 seconds for 6 bullets rather than 48 seconds for 6 bullets is a crazy difference.
-
2 OdpowiedziThorn - tlw: justified. The rest: wtf did u guys smoke.....
-
3 OdpowiedziI agree with the PvP changes. I disagree with the PvE changes.
-
Mnehhope
-
7 OdpowiedziBungie owes us nothing
-
You could save $40 or more by switching to 2.0
-
4 OdpowiedziThey don't have to change anything because some people on the forums don't like it. They are working with statistics and they see the numbers. That says a lot more than some people whining around here
-
2 Odpowiedzi[b] [/b]
-
4 OdpowiedziThey won't change it. I think they'll be dangling new powerful weapons in front of your nose come September and one might no longer care about the past ones.
-
Save your butthurt for when the update drops. Soak up those tears, sport.
-
-
-
The amount of people who are complaining about it on the forums vs the amount of people that actually play the game is minimal. Like under 5%.
-
1 OdpowiedźJudging by how your post has ZERO likes. I believe the majority like 2.0
-
1 OdpowiedźPvp yea but some of the pve changes make me question if they wish to remove pve all together. Some choices make little sense but we will see when it drops.
-
So the community cries nerf this nerf that. And Bungie does. Now the community cries undo it...undo it. And Bungie does........nothing. So? I guess you need to shed more tears for Bungie to care. Good luck with that.
-
Thorn and tlw are the only good thing about 2.0
-
"Remember how Bungie said they wanted every gun to have a story behind it? Look how that turned out, either we just killed the same enemy 50 times or bought it, or got carried and got it instead of the guy who actually deserved it." *Gun gets nerfed* "Wha-wha- Bungie! You're taking away the epic stories behind our guns!"
-
Somebody help me... Man overboard. Drowning in a sea of thorn crutch tears
-
Whether we like the game or not it doesn't matter to bungie. Theyre update is probably cheaper for them to run so they'll run it
