{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/20/2015 3:03:41 PM
239
Bungie Don't You Think Enough Guardians Hate 2.0 To Change It!!!!
I have heard people say they are ok with it. That's fine for them but let's be honest enough of us don't like it to change it. I get you want us to use the new weapons in TTK. Just don't take away the epic stories we have of how we got and upgraded our prized exotics to 365.
English
#Destiny
-
Change is necessary... It's going to happen no matter what people say...
-
Sigh. They don't need to change anything because honestly these changes are necessary. It's been months without a weapon update. I'm sure if the changes were monthly most of these would be in affect. Will they take a second look? It wouldn't hurt but the way people are flipping shiz is making the forums so toxic. I see most people angry about black hammer/icebreaker/Ghorn. Ghorn will still be the nuking king. Sitting back stun locking the boss to death is a not way the game was supposed to be played (blackhammer) and sitting back and cheesing things with the ice breakers amo recharging (VoG Oracles) was also not intentional. I just wish these changes took affect before the next iron banner. Looks like another round with thorns everywhere. Yay. Thank goodness after this I'm done with IB unless there's new guns lmao.
-
No they wont. Plus I'm pretty sure forums users don't even equal out to more than 50% of players.
-
I'm cool with it. All nerfs have a reason.
-
6 OdpowiedziI never said I don't "like it". Let's face it, who doesn't love nuking everything with gjallarhorn? I think it's really fun to do so. But at the same Time it shows how over powered it actually is. And with something that OP being nerfed, I'm happy to see it being nerfed. I don't want this game to be "okay for the boss battle let's all grab out our gjallarhorns", I want this to be more of a "okay I'll use my gjallarhorn while you use your thunderlord so you could deal more damage overtime". There shouldn't be an obvious answer, an obvious weapon to take.
-
14 OdpowiedziNo not really you have only a few people being very vocal about it...and most of those are vocal because they don't want a weapon to be balanced accordingly. My only issue is with the black hammer.....sad to see such a great weapon get nerfed but the rest of the weapons all seem to be pretty much inline. Hawkmoons stacking of 3 rounds for a OHK is so rare you wont notice a difference one way or the other. Personally wish they would make it so that none of the rounds would stack but oh well. All in all I cannot wait to test out these new weapons balances. Regarding the Ghorn nerf.....you must admit we all knew this was coming one day...it is so powerful that it literally can allow you to skip whole fight sequences.
-
3 Odpowiedzino, because most people like it. The only things people are actually upset about are ghorn, icebreaker and blackhammer, and even a lot of people get the reasoning even if they disagree. Black hammer excluded. Oh, and the crybabies who are sad their crucible crutches will be more on par with all the other weapons now.
-
2 OdpowiedziI'm not really mad about the change anymore after I stopped being an idiot and read the whole article I saw all the changes were to make sure variety was added and people could play with anyone.
-
If more than 50% dislike it they will change it. But from what Ive seen less than 20% dislike it so it wont change.
-
Don't you think the changes are needed? The meta in crucible has been there for long enough. And the gjallarhorn was coming, everybody knows it. Only one that I don't found necessary was the icebreaker nerf. Even the black hammer one was necessary, sadly
-
Why not try it before moaning?
-
Instead of taking the lazy way out and Nerfing our current Vanilla exotics, how about they use some creativity and grey matter and come up with new weapons that can excite players enough to use them? I mean "Shank Burn?" Who is designing some of this stuff? Come on man!
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika OmegaSpaceWolf: 7/22/2015 2:33:40 PMSo destiny meant to be a kinda mmo but then they limited armour to classes and force people to use what they want, right.
-
Do you want to know why they won't change it? Because you people crying about it haven't even experienced it and want it to change. I want to see what it's like before I start crying about it like all of you babies. It's like a parent with a picky toddler, try to give it something new to eat and it starts whining saying it doesn't like it, before even tasting it. Is the parent just going to say "Oh you don't like it without trying it? Okay I'll change it"? No, it's going to give it the food and then see if the toddler likes it or not. So Bungee isn't going to change this just because it's babies don't want it before experiencing it.
-
You are seeing the VERY VOCAL minority. I wouldn't base Amy decsion off of that.
-
1 OdpowiedźNah, plenty people love it. You only see the hate
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika FROGGY: 7/22/2015 2:22:29 PMThey are not worried about current players, they felt they needed to make old weapons irrelevant in an effort to entice newer players to to join by starting fresh for everyone. Unfortunately it just makes it like any other game franchise. So grind away and repeat till your burned out (like I became with cod). I enjoyed Destiny but unfortunately I thought it was going to be different and more of a long term continuation with new weapons and gear but all old gear would stop dropping while still relevant. How cool would a trading system been a few years down the road with all the different types of gear out there, it could have been so unique to all other games. It was fun while it lasted but I think I will grind out a new game soon. WHEN'S RED DEAD REDEMPTION 2 COMING OUT?[spoiler] THIS WAS NOT A WEAPONS REBALANCING AS THEY WOULD LIKE YOU TO THINK, THIS IS TO SLOWLY MAKE OLD WEAPONS IRRELEVANT. THEY MADE THAT CLEAR A FEW WEEKS BACK IN A INTERVIEW BY MISTAKE[/spoiler]
-
3 OdpowiedziEdytowany przez użytkownika Newbold1: 7/22/2015 10:53:52 AMBecause the majority of the player base who are okay with it aren't on the forums screaming about how amazing it is. The only posts are people crying about it. New year, new weapons stop crying.
-
3 OdpowiedziSo if enough people don't like change even if it's for the better, it shouldn't happen? Well there goes women suffage, the civil rights movement and I guess the legalization of weed. :(
-
5 OdpowiedziThorn got to go! rest for a while like suros did True i get a good amount of kills with it. But it isn't fair for the guy being shot, nor is fair for me One hit, then DoT, you dead. Not competitive at all.
-
Or maybe folks could consider the sky wont fall and check out the weapons post adjustment before tantruming all over the forums? I know, inconceivable...
-
2 OdpowiedziPeople confuse being vocal for being a majority.
-
1 OdpowiedźDestiny and "epic stories"? Right...
-
2.0 is fine as it is, most of the changes were warranted.
-
What your post really means: No!! Not my thorn (insert tears) now I won't win a match in crucible
-
Or some of us don't see the point in complaining two months before 2.0 is released.
