{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Modificato da Soatok:
10/26/2019 5:36:49 AM
71
Gambit without Invasions (or any PvP at all) would be perfection
Seriously: A non-PvP Gambit mode which consists [i]entirely[/i] of competitive PVE (who can get the primeval summoned and burned quicker?) would be so much more pleasant than what we have today.
It would give dedicated PVE players a chance to compete in gear races without having to suffer through PvP.
EDIT: Since this has caused a tiny bit of confusion...
I'm not saying "change Gambit for everyone". I'm saying a "no invader" mode should be a valid option for PVE players who want powerful rewards during week one of a season and are otherwise forced to do PVP.
Ideally, you should be able to do endgame PVE without ever having touched a PVP mode in your life.
Cooperative > Competitive
-
1 RispondiModificato da Lord_Shar: 10/23/2019 10:45:27 PM[quote]Seriously: A non-PvP Gambit mode which consists [i]entirely[/i] of competitive PVE (who can get the primeval summoned and burned quicker?) would be so much more pleasant than what we have today. It would give dedicated PVE players a chance to compete in gear races without having to suffer through PvP.[/quote] I can see the merits of having a PVE-only gambit mode to appeal to PVE-only players, but if such a mode is created, it should NOT have the same rewards as the rest of Gambit. So no 21% Delerium, Hush, Exit Strategy, etc. quest progress in this mode since there is no danger of being disrupted by invasions. It can still have its own unique rewards under a different tracker, but it should not share the unique rewards of other Gambit modes given the missing Invader element.
