{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/23/2019 7:32:59 PM
2
The point of gambit is a pve/pvp showdown though. Why not get rid of crucible and replace it with just fighting some fallen, right? Just doesn't work mate.
English
-
Also as a follow up to this. I care about lore meaning to certain things, and gambit has a bit of lore reasoning to invading. In fact the invader is what it's logically based around. The drifter wants us to harness darkness and control it without losing control or dying to it. What's the point of something where you're tested to control your darkness when you don't even have the option to harness it in the first place?
-
I would totally never ever touch Crucible if my raid team didn't demand a specific load-out, which requires Gambit/Crucible gear. That's the game I want for myself: If you want to do good at PVE, do PVE. If you want to do good at PVP, do PVP. Not vice versa.
