{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/22/2020 10:00:25 PM
43
Good job on 110 HC buff, but removing 150s was a mistake
I am happy with almost every balance change from the TWAB, except the removal of 150RPM handcannons. I personally prefer 140s and used to use them over 150s despite their ttk being higher. I don't see how you could buff autos to have a .8 TTK, but not leave a HC archetype that can do the same.
People wanted more range and better perks on 140s over 150s... not the removal of 150s. Even with these changes, 600 autos are still likely to dominate over 140s in crucible.
Still, I'm very satisfied with this last TWAB. Overall, I like the direction you're moving toward.
-
Not saying the merger shouldn’t have been the other way around - but 150s did give hunters an inherent buff to dodge cooldown. No other class got a buff to their class ability just by selecting a primary weapon that also had an optimal .8 ttk without empowering effects or kill clip or whatever. I think a better approach would have been to make adaptives 150s and drop the access to lightweight buffs to hunter mobility & class ability specifically. This would at least have put warlocks, hunters, and titans more on par with each other. And kept 150s competitive.
