{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/19/2015 7:53:08 AM
5
I do find angry Joe scores are usually around the same as what I score games.
He is a good reviewer IMO, brings up a lot of positive, negative points.
Joe is a fan of the halo series, but isn't afraid to tell a home truth...
English
-
This..OP is one of the fanboys he talks about in the review for Halo 5. Just can't except the fact the game has flaws..his assessment of this game was on point ,too. HIS JOB IS BEING A CRITIC. Don't think ppl understand that concept.
-
There's a difference between accepting and mentioning flaws, and being a complete asshole and aggravating minor flaws, when the game as a whole is quite good.
-
Yeah, you're proving his point even more. And it's funny cause' he said that 343i said "inappropriate" things to the fans in a video. Yet he does the same thing to both the developers, and the fans, except on a bigger scale
-
They did not. They made a tongue in cheek skit video that was meant to be funny but he can't take a joke. He is literally the only person I have ever seen get mad at that video. His treatment of halo 5's review was poorly developed, unprofessional and reactionary.
-
Just like pretty much every other review during 2014-15 he made
