[quote][quote]But thanks for all [u]he[/u] hard work. Stupid is as stupid does[/quote]I won't do your work for you[/quote]Oh, but you are. Your demonstration of self stupidity just keeps coming. [quote]I know what I am talking about[/quote]And yet you cannot prove it with a simple link - sad. Proved my claim through multiple links, from both British and American sources ... and yet sad little [b]you[/b] are unable to provide a single link. Happy to [u]give[/u] you one more chance before proclaiming your challenge [b]FAILURE[/b].

All you have been proving is how ignorant you are. Awe. You need a hug. I did not say I could not. I said I would not. Perhaps you can go to that online dictionary and figure out the difference (doubtful I know... But you should at least try). I won't do your work for you. You are lazy and ignorant. Perfect combination. This is too easy. Got you last. Again.

[quote]I did not say I could not. I said I would not[/quote]You appear confused ... I do not care what you say, I will judge you by your actions. You have [b]FAILED[/b]. Just as you did with your original claims of Marty not having a share holding. Just as you did with bungies registration under which these shares were issued. What will be your next [b]FAILURE[/b].

I'm not confused. I amused. Look those up dummy.

[quote]I'm not confused. I amused[/quote]lol ... "[u]I amused[/u]", you certainly did with your demonstrations of stupidity. I [u]am[/u] amused at how you can make such errors when trying to correct others. But we have already seen enough of that - I was actually looking for another form of [b]FAILURE[/b].

I was not trying to correct others. That's your speciality. I am amused at your feeble attempts to tell a member that he "spelt" a word wrong. Let's continue in your language shall we? Perhaps he [i]learnt[/i] the wrong way to spell. Then he [i]dreamt[/i] of a day he could spell better. But in that dream, he could not wake up. The fire consumed him and he was [i]burnt[/i] alive. When authorities arrived on scene, they [i]smelt[/i] his remains. Again oh ignorant one. Please learn the differences. http://grammarist.com/spelling/spelled-spelt/ http://www.grammar-monster.com/easily_confused/spelled_spelt.htm

[quote]I [u]am[/u] amused[/quote]Well done, [url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/68373597]in your post above you didn't do so well[/url] :( [quote]http://grammarist.com/spelling/spelled-spelt/[/quote]Recognises the word Spelt, nothing there to show it as "[i]not a real word[/i]" as you would like me to believe. [quote]http://www.grammar-monster.com/easily_confused/spelled_spelt.htm[/quote]Same here ... nothing to say. And now you are renting about other words ... wow - way to avoid your own level of butthurt on being proved wrong about Marty's share holding. But since you believe the idiot who used the word "[i]unentelligunt[/i]" to be correct and worthy of your defense, please show us one of your wonderful links showing "unentelligunt" to be an actual word. Either than or get back on topic, unless the butthurt is still raging too deep on that one point.

I'll take that as your concession. I never said [i]spelt[/i] was not a word. What I did imply was that you are a tool for not spelling the word [i]spelled[/i] correctly, whilst trying to make fun of another member for incorrectly spelling the word, unintelligent. Candle meet flame. Just admit it. Or, like unsaid in a previous post, admit that you have a panache for 19th century British, English writing.

[quote]I never said spelt was not a word[/quote]At last, took you a while to get here.[quote]not spelling the word spelled correctly[/quote]Oh but I did, and now you even admit that it was a word, and various links (by yourself and me) showing that fact, and its correct use and spelling. [quote]incorrectly spelling the word, unintelligent[/quote]And now you also admit the post in question was wrong. We are on a roll ... can almost smell a full apology. [quote]Or, like [u]unsaid[/u] in a previous post,[/quote]Have to correct you again - hope you don't mind - but if it was "unsaid" (would say unwritten, but that's not the point) how can it be "like" that post? If a point is unstated how can that point be like (or unlike) another ... for two elements to be compared their states must first be defined. Trust this point is not too tricky for you. Now, are you sure you don't want to get back on topic? Appreciate you bumping the thread for me, but don't want the mods thinking you are an alt-account of mine.

[quote]At last, took you a while to get here.[/quote] How can it take anyone, any amount of time to get someplace they never went? Every time you post, you ascend to higher levels of stupidity. You have been doing this a while now. What's your lvl cap? [quote]Oh but I did, and now you even admit that it was a word, and various links (by yourself and me) showing that fact, and its correct use.[/quote] That's not correct. You are American. You are posting in an American forum. You learned how to spell in America. The syntax of the English American dictionary does not use the word spelt, unless the subject in wheat. It says so right there in the many links that have been posted. See? A new level of stupidity by you.They way you spelt the word was incorrect in this context. [quote]And now you also admit the post in question was wrong.[/quote] I never argued that point. You assume too much, and ponder too little. [quote]We are on a roll ... can almost smell a full apology.[/quote] Nothing of the sort. The only rolls in this exchange are the ones on the back of your neck. [quote]Have to correct you again - hope you don't mind - but if it was "unsaid" (would say unwritten, but that's not the point) how can it be "like" that post? If a point is unstated how can that point be like (or unlike) another ... for two elements to be compared their states must first be defined.[/quote] You are not correcting me... Or anyone for that matter. What you are demonstrating, repeatedly, is a gross misunderstanding of multiple subjects. If something goes unsaid twice, is it remotely possible that is how they are alike? It's really not that hard to grasp... Oh. I forgot who I was communicating with. [quote]Now, are you sure you don't want to get back on topic?[/quote] Let's. There is no such thing as Destiny stock, or stock in Destiny. Stack shares or not. Bungie Inc has shares... (Let's not discuss types here as it's irrelevant) Which is what Marty won back in arbitration. Bungie is incorporated, not an LLC. This thread is still not related to Destiny. No matter how far you would like to string out the degrees of separation. The case is about Marty vs. Bungie Inc. Please explain how this is in any way related to Destiny the game?

[quote][quote][quote]I never said spelt was not a word[/quote]At last, took you a while to get here[/quote]How can it take anyone, any amount of time to get someplace they never went[/quote]So first you admit that spelt is a word ... and two posts later you deny it ?!? Or did you simple forget - lol. [quote]You are American. You are posting in an American forum. You learned how to spell in America[/quote]Wrong, wrong and wrong again - lol. When did I say I was american - that's all in your little mind. And it is the "Bungie" forum retard, go have a look at the top of the page - it does not say "american". Now have a close look at the URL under which YOUR post appears; [url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/68414816]http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/68414816[/url], here is a clue for you .... the "en" stands for English. And (if you know just a little html) have a look at the element "select_language" and you will also see "English". Catching on yet? And no, I did not learn to spell in America. Feeling better now? [quote]Bungie is incorporated, not an LLC[/quote]The ruling was for bungie to re-instate those shares as originally issued under the LLC incarnation - but if you feel the judgement was wrong you are arguing in the wrong place. Not sure why you find this so difficult to understand. [quote]This thread is still not related to Destiny ... The case is about Marty vs. Bungie[/quote]Which is why it is in the [b]Bungie[/b] forum ... yep, same one that's not called the "[b]american[/b]" forum. You are a fool, how hard would it have been for you to check this?? It is also related to "Destiny the game" as Marty now (through his lawful ownership of bungie shares) be getting a nice piece of cash from the sales of the game, plus hopefully again be putting his flavor on the game. Not like bungie has any other game now is it, or do you think Activision owns the game? And again, thanks for the bump ... keeps it in the most active segment, so worthy given it relates to Marty's win.

So... Not only are you an argumentative retard, you are disingenuous too. I had mentioned many posts ago, that your writing style would make sense if you were taught in the British, English writing style. Had you owned up to that, the rest would have been irrelevant. But you did not do that. You kept up the charade for arguments sake. But your writing style is not on the British, English writing style. It's in the American, English writing style. Why you would choose the word spelt, over spelled, is still a mystery. It seems you only know about a single language. English has many branches. You are also wrong about the shares that were returned to Marty. The company cannot reverse the share type once it has been converted without a shareholder vote. They are not even B1 shares at this point. What does happen though, is he will get the converted value of the newest common shares. Lastly, your excuse that this belongs in #destiny is weak-sauce at best. Answer me this, if I made a post about Blizzard/Activision stock, would it be fair to place it in #destiny? I will keep this thread bumped for as long as it takes for you to get it. I work with special needs children all the time. I won't make an exception for you.

Another wall of text demonstrating nothing but [b]FAILURE[/b]. [quote]disingenuous[/quote]Please show us were you ask and I answered that I was American. Another example of you reading into peoples replies what you want to see - very sad. [quote]the rest would have been irrelevant[/quote]Your post was irrelevant from the start. You even provided links showing that "spelt" was a word and correctly spelt and used. You got butthurt over the whole share issue and now can't let go. [quote]It seems you only know about a single language. English has many branches[/quote]Again - that is your obsession, not mine. [quote]You are also wrong about the shares that were returned to Marty. The company cannot reverse the share type once it has been converted without a shareholder vote[/quote]No, the order has been issued, Marty will be getting his shares back. The order also addresses the issue of share structure - perhaps if you actually read the ruling you would not be so willing to make a fool of yourself. Your disrespect for Marty is shameful. You are willing to come here and troll the man and the legal finding - and without even the basic knowledge. [quote]Lastly, your excuse that this belongs in #destiny is weak-sauce at best[/quote]We have been through this before - even provided you links [url=http://www.bungie.net/en-us/Forum/Post/64792113/0/0/1]such as this[/url] - feel free to go read up and rage on other threads if you like. Your bitterness towards Marty getting back what is legally his is obvious. Why do you hold so much hate towards the outcome? Both parties put their case, and bungie lost - deal with it, let your troll rage go.

[quote]Please show us were you ask and I answered that I was American. Another example of you reading into peoples replies what you want to see - very sad.[/quote] Thanks for demonstrating your lack of reading comprehension for the umpteenth time. You have a habit of putting words in people's mouths. I will list some examples from our fine conversation during the past week. I did not ask you if you were American. I stated... [quote]Unless you are claiming that your are from Britain[/quote] Your reply was another irrelevant, off topic, piece of garbage... with you trying to back peddle by claiming you placed a "trap" for me. Did you really delude yourself into thinking that? A trap? Really? Had you simply stated at [b][i][u]that [/u][/i][/b]point that you were British, or not from America, the rest of the conversation could have been avoided. I would have conceded to your preferred spelling of the British/English standard "spelt". But you did not (another disingenuous example), So I continued to argue the American/English standard. I should have realized after going over these pages, that when I saw the words "recognise" (American: recognize), "whinging" (American: whining), learnt (American: learned)... that I was dealing with a person not from my country. Do you realize I never stated spelt was not a word? You tried to put those words in my mouth. I stated, or meant to imply, that spelt is not used in American/English writing in the way you used it. Ex... "He spelt that word wrong." Let us move on to more problems with your reading comprehension shall we? In reply to your "trap" comment, I stated [quote]I did not say it was a British use because your reference was from the Oxford dictionary. I said it because, any dictionary says so. Much like we spell "color", and they spell "colour".[/quote] You see? I admitted in this very post that I was differentiating between the American and British writing styles. You had the chance again... right here to diffuse the debate. But you [b][i][u]CHOSE [/u][/i][/b] not to. Your response was this... [quote]So in your little mind the Princeton University is a British institution ... wow, more stupidity at work. And even your claim to "spelt" only being applicable to a species of wheat ... you do know that the origins of that species is Europe (not America)? (defeated by your own argument - lol)[/quote] WOW!!! How was that even a response to what I said? All you do is bring in irrelevant topic, to your other irrelevant topics. It muddies the waters and keeps the conversation from going anywhere. Just another example of your disingenuous nature. Lets move on... In the next piece... I will discuss your hypocrisy. You see, when a debater is losing an argument, they will reach out at anything to try to derail the conversation. In another post to me... [quote]lol ... "I amused", you certainly did with your demonstrations of stupidity. I am amused at how you can make such errors when trying to correct others.[/quote] This was because of a typo where I did not put the word "am" in there. You jump on it like a mongoose to the viper. It's because you have nothing else. I could have done the same... [quote]And now you are [b][i][u]renting [/u][/i][/b]about other words[/quote] Perhaps you meant "ranting" ? [quote]Afraid all this is [b][i][u]oall [/u][/i][/b]in your (rather small) mind :([/quote] Perhaps you meant "all"? [quote]wow - way to avoid your own level of butthurt on being [b][i][u]proved [/u][/i][/b]wrong about Marty's share holding.[/quote] Perhaps you meant "proven"? There are many more mistakes to point out in your writing... but I chose not to. It was irrelevant, and I understood what you were trying to say. Lastly... lets stay on the original topic. Where you were... in factual findings from this very thread... wrong on your POV of the subject. I posted to you... [quote]He was dismissed from Bungie inc.[/quote] To which you responded [quote]Wrong again ... bungie llc actually. Funny how you came in trying to be the big man, but still got it wrong - lol..[/quote] But [b][i][u]YOU [/u][/i][/b]were wrong on that count. And too stubborn to admit it... You then were blubbering and fumbling for recovery... about how his shares were originally granted under Arete Seven LLC...which I pointed out... then became Bungie LLC, which then became Bungie Inc... which is completely irrelevant to [b][i][u]YOUR [/u][/i][/b]post that claimed he was dismissed from [b][i][u]Bungie LLC[/u][/i][/b]. SInce Bungie LLC became incorporated in December of 2010, how was Marty fired from Bungie LLC in April 2014? Time machine? Tear in the fabric of space/time? You tell me. Your original claim... [quote]- he now owns (again) a stack of shares in Destiny.[/quote] is, was, and always shall be wrong. As is another claim [quote]The ruling was for bungie to re-instate those shares as originally issued under the LLC incarnation[/quote] The order states as verbatim, in the quote below... "Within seven (7) days of the date of this order, Respondents shall take all steps necessary and shall issue to O'Donnell the shares he owned on April 10, 2014, together with any dividends, distributions or other proceeds that may have been distributed between April 10, 2014 and the date of this order." Your claim, as quoted for your post (above) is abjectly incorrect. Not only was he not fired from Bungie LLC, he was also not awarded his stock holdings in their original Bungie LLC format. Remember... Bungie LLC became Bungie Inc. in December of2010. Therefore, by the courts own decision, it would be IMPOSSIBLE to reinstate his shares under the prior companies LLC if they are requesting a reinstatement of shares from April 10th, 2014. Are you still following along? I don't think you could tell the difference between an LLC and LL Cool J at this point ;-) There are no such thing as "shares in Destiny". What he won back was an undetermined amount of shares of Bungie Inc... (which is also what I claimed above)... [quote]He had shares in company stock... Not Destiny[/quote] The [i]preliminary [/i] injunction (not final mind you, as Bungie has the option to appeal) states the following. "If Bungie cannot legally issue shares of B1 preferred stock, it shall issue the [u]equivalent value[/u] of common shares in the same manner other owners of B1 preferred stock receive common stock.". Having been in board rooms throughout my career, I can almost guarantee you that the current shareholders will not vote against their own interests and convert those common shares back to B1 Preferred shares. Unless Marty had 51% of the shares, it will never happen. What will happen is that Marty will get his equivalent value in its current form. Put that in your righteous pipe and smoke it until you choke, you pompous ass. Your illogical, and at most times... irrelevant, POV has been put on display on the Bungie forum for the world to see. I will link this page and look back on it from time to time. It has been an amusing, and challenging time to get through to you. I hope you are done at this point. What else can you say?

[quote]Please show us were you ask and I answered that I was American.[quote]I did not ask you if you were American. I stated...[quote]Unless you are claiming that your are from Britain[/quote][/quote][/quote]So I ask for two points and [b]YOU[/b] can provide [b]NEITHER[/b]; 1) you did ask if I was American, [b]YOU[/b] just [b]ASSUMED[/b] (fool) 2) I did not state nor imply that I was either American nor British (as the point was irrelevant - [url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/68451466]as you said[/url]) And then lets include the final assertion in that quoted link; "[i]Unless you are claiming that your are from Britain ... Now [u]bugger off Limey[/u][/i]" So you call me "Limey" (British) and now you insist I am American ... confused?? [quote]Had you simply stated at that point that you were British, or not from America, the rest of the conversation could have been avoided. I would have conceded to your preferred spelling of the British/English standard "spelt". [/quote]Or from any large number of other English speaking nations ... you are again demonstrating just how close minded you are ... either that or desperately trying to dig your way out of that hole. [quote]I admitted in this very post that I was differentiating between the American and British writing styles. You had the chance again... right here to diffuse the debate. But you CHOSE not to[/quote]Admission accepted. I CHOSE not to because it had NOTHING to do with the original topic, go check the thread subject. You appear to have an unhealthy obsession; - it was not related to the thread subject, - it is not a writing style site (but a gaming site). ([i]and ironically you cry foul about me posting in the wrong forum!![/i]) - none of this is at all relevant to bungie being ordered to return Marty's shares. [quote]You see, when a debater is losing an argument, they will reach out at anything to try to derail the conversation[/quote]So like go off topic and rant on-and-on about differences in American spelling ??? Nice point, but I already knew you were loosing the argument. But solid point against yourself. [quote]The preliminary injunction (not final mind you, as Bungie has the option to appeal) states the following. "If Bungie cannot legally issue shares of B1 preferred stock, it shall issue the equivalent value of common shares in the same manner other owners of B1 preferred stock receive common stock."[/quote]Well done, you located the reference I mentioned above with; "[i]No, the order has been issued, Marty will be getting his shares back. The order also addresses the issue of share structure[/i]". So yes they have been order to re-instate the shares but provision has been made for reality. Well done. [quote]Having been in board rooms throughout my career ... It has been challenging time to get through[/quote]lol ... you poor baby. How did you survive that tough environment, especially when you are now finding a public forum conversation "[i]challenging[/i]". But then a newbie sys-admin would find it challenging in a board room - especially one who lists a [cough] community college as one of his highest educational achievements. Almost as sad as photo-shopping your mum out of your profile shop. This is classic .... board room career ... self esteem anyone ?. Hope you don't mind me cutting out 90% of your rant - but to be honest it is dead boring. I know your sys-admin (board room wannbe) wouldn't think so ... but it is, just look into the faces of people you speak to over the next 24 hours, even your mother.

More reading comprehension errors from you Oh Ignorant One? Do you ever stop to think about what you are typing before you type it? Lets see what I wrote, and you just replied to... I wrote...[quote]Had you simply stated at that point that you were British, [b][u]or not from America[/u][/b], the rest of the conversation could have been avoided. I would have conceded to your preferred spelling of the British/English standard "spelt". [/quote] And you replied... [quote][b]Or from any large number of other English speaking nations[/b]... you are again demonstrating just how close minded you are ... either that or desperately trying to dig your way out of that hole.[/quote] Please stay focused on the bolded highlights. Let thank sink in fool. I cant believe you did not comprehend that simple sentence. Makes sense why you have such a hard time connecting other things together. Then this... [quote]I CHOSE not to[/quote] So you CHOSE not to worry about the writing styles because... [quote]it had NOTHING to do with the original topic, go check the thread subject.[/quote], but you did choose to keep arguing the defined word, despite its irrelevance in post, after post, after post. Hmmm [quote]So like go off topic and rant on-and-on about differences in American spelling ??? Nice point, but I already knew you were loosing the argument. But solid point against yourself. [/quote] Wrong again. I was discussing the differences between the American and British dictionaries at the time... not just American spelling (you are slipping buddy). Ahem... but [b]you [/b]were the one to bring up spelling errors in your own thread, so don't complain about it going off topic. Please read [b]your [/b]post to another poster. [quote] lol ... love the edit on an insult - guessing you spelt "unintelligent" incorrectly.[/quote] Now we have direct proof of your disingenuousness. You actually edited my post, to twist it into something I did not say... then you proceed to pick it apart. Lets look at that difference together shall we? This is what I wrote... [quote]Having been in board rooms throughout my career, I can almost guarantee you that the current shareholders will not vote against their own interests and convert those common shares back to B1 Preferred shares. Unless Marty had 51% of the shares, it will never happen. What will happen is that Marty will get his equivalent value in its current form. Put that in your righteous pipe and smoke it until you choke, you pompous ass. Your illogical, and at most times... irrelevant, POV has been put on display on the Bungie forum for the world to see. I will link this page and look back on it from time to time. It has been an amusing, and challenging time to get through to you. I hope you are done at this point. What else can you say?[/quote] And yet... somehow, you come out with this... [quote]Having been in board rooms throughout my career ... It has been challenging time to get through[/quote] You did not cut out 90% because it was dead boring. You cut it out because you have no other recourse. You were wrong about the type of stock, the timing of the incorporation, the timing of Marty's termination... and everything else in about that article. Not sure what your love obsession with Marty is, or your hate for Bungie... but your rabid defense of him has led you to many mistakes. My board room experience is not in question here. Nice try with the passive/aggressive jealousy though. Well done. The challenge for me was trying to reach you... not communication on the board. Again... nice passive/aggressive shot though. You have lost this debate in every facet other than the word "spelt". You can spell it however you like, but please work a bit on your grammar... Because posts like this... [quote]Nice point, but I already knew you were [b]loosing [/b]the argument.[/quote] Or this... [quote]Sure [b]you [/b]time in (cleaning) board rooms would have taught you that.[/quote]. Perhaps English (despite its origins) is not your strong suit after all. Thank you for taking the time to make a fool of yourself again. Its a bright spot on my already great day. I will be back again tomorrow to see what other drivel, misunderstandings of general law... corporate law, grammatical errors, misquoting, reading comprehension, passive /aggressive insults, and whatever else you can pull out of that bottomless pit you call a mind. I can taste those salty tears of frustration. Ciao for now. Try to have a good day.

Rant, rant and more rant. [quote]Ahem... but you were the one to bring up spelling errors in your own thread, so don't complain about it going off topic[/quote]But [b]YOU[/b] acknowledge that it was not a "[i]spelling error[/i]" but a "[i]differences between the American and British dictionaries[/i]". So please make you mind up, pick an argument and stick to it. [quote]You did not cut out 90% because it was dead boring. You cut it out because you have no other recourse[/quote]Nope ... it was dead boring, oh and repetitive. Just like this last rant - very little more than you have not repeated over-and-over-and-over in the dozens of replies above .... boring (but I know you desktop support jockeys have a high tolerance for boring) . [quote]Not sure what your love obsession with Marty is, or your hate for Bungie... but your rabid defense of him has led you to many mistakes.[/quote]I am just quoting the findings of a legal process. Why do you object, and why do you show so much hate towards Mary and the case outcome? [quote]My board room experience is not in question here[/quote]But you introduced it with [b]your[/b] claim of "[url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/68493367][i]Having been in board rooms throughout my career[/i][/url]", and yet you have none - you are but a desktop support jockey with a community college standing. And yet you come here and spend days posting hate towards Marty's success. ([i]and the share holding - who's name did you register that in - lol[/i]) And why promote your "[i]been in board rooms throughout my career[/i]" ? You attempt to imply that you have been there is some authoritative capacity, when the truth is you have [at best] been summoned to fix a cable or some other mundane tech-monkey task ... with all hope you will have it done quietly, quickly and moved on. Is this some form of self deception - or is it standard practice for you to tell lies in the hope of not being caught out? Even the act of photo-shopping your mother out of that photo, why? Does your self image fall that low that you think someone would think less of you if you because you stood there with your mother (not to mention her reaction if she ever viewed your efforts)?

What the -blam!- are you even talking about son? You don't know me. You go off on some tangent about a guess on my career ( which you were wrong about), my mother, a photo, all while telling me in the prior post to stay on topic? You have some issues boy. Best get them taken care of, before someone takes care of them for you. The fact still remains that that you were incorrect on most counts about the "findings of fact" that you profess about. Can you stay on topic? Or have I struck that nerve again. Try not to lash out about irrelevant topics in your next reply chief.

[quote]talking about son[/quote]No,not your son - that's a nasty thing to say to me, almost as hateful as you have been towards Marty. [quote]guess on my career ( which you were wrong about)[/quote]So you admit your no board member then - lol. Or are you now also denying your right to call yourself a SysAdmin (some of those other forum posts back it up, but its your call). [quote]Best get them taken care of, before someone takes care of them for you[/quote]More shallow threats ... happy to dish your hate out on Marty ... claim your board room experience - but when called to task you turn to shallow worthless threats. Honestly? And [b]AGAIN[/b] you [b]FAIL[/b] to answer a single question put to you ... classic avoidance. No answer to your false claims of board room experience? No explanation for the self deception? No justification for the photo-shopping shame? ([i]signs of her facial paralysis, the smile - guessing cerebral palsy or stoke - but still, shame??[/i]) Its all very sad that you attempt to continually attack others, attack a legal ruling - and yet when challenged on your claims of justification you move to avoid any form of answer. You have attacked Marty and the lawful findings enough - time for some answers.

Yes!!! Those salty tears of frustration are apparent. Please give me more. Helps the day go by faster... You did not ask any questions about my career in you last post to me. You ASSumed things you were incorrect about. I am a Systems Admin. I have been in board rooms for support of top level clients. I am a trusted advisor to members of the board within my company. I have direct interface with them daily. I never claimed to have voted myself... I just observe and learn what I can... Which is much more than I can say for you. You have learned nothing in this exchange. You just tell people to stay on topic, while not having the courtesy to follow your own rules. If you ask, I will answer. You seem to crave attention though and I am willing to grant that to a lonely soul. How much further down the rabbit hole do you want to go Alice? PS. I don't have any hate for "Mary" (you "spelt" his name wrong genius!) or Bungie for that matter. I have a calling to never give up on lost souls that need some form of contact (you). Talk to you soon own pal! PSS. Love the off topic attack on my mother. How big is the fantasy world you live in? Please provide proof of this photoshopped picture with me and my mother and her "stoke" (guessing you meant stroke? Spelt wrong again dummy)... Or cerebral palsy. Otherwise... It's just another lie from a sad, lonely child, craving attention.

[quote]I am a Systems Admin[/quote]lol ... first it was "[i]been in board rooms throughout my career[/i]" ... and now you have been demoted to the lowest of the lows in IT - a SysAdmin ... that was a quick fall. Sadly even when you say "[i]Systems Admin[/i]" your own references say "[url=https://www.chamberofcommerce.com/bellport-ny/8180459-tactronics][b]DESKTOP SUPPORT[/b] ADMIN[/url]" ... isn't that like being the lacky of a SysAdmin - so lower than the lowest of the lows. [quote]I have been in board rooms for support of top level clients[/quote]In your role as DESKTOP SUPPORT ... did they have desktops in that board room ... this is classic self delusion. Perhaps we should check with them direct, just to see if they would back your "board room" support? [quote]I never claimed to have voted myself[/quote]So what did you mean then when you posted "[url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/68493367]Having been in [u]board rooms throughout my career[/u], I can almost [u]guarantee[/u] you that the current shareholders [u]will not vote[/u][/url]" ? You tried to make yourself out to be the [b]BIG MAN[/b] ... somehow better than Marty ... somehow (guaranteed) knowing of voting actions and closed board room plays. A mere desktop support boi ... caught out in full (or is that fool) flight - lol. [quote]How much further down the rabbit hole do you want to go Alice?[/quote]Hey, I wasn't going to mention those web site visits ... you do have some obsessive habits, but I guess that's what you job allows for in its less social darken corners. Lets just write this "question" off as a cross post error, even though there are now a few more contacts we could all on to check out the depth for their joint amusement. [quote]If you ask, I will answer[/quote]And yet you have not ... why? In case you missed them, here they are again; - No answer to your false claims of board room experience? - No explanation for the self deception? - No justification for the photo-shopping shame? (signs of her facial paralysis, the smile - guessing cerebral palsy or stoke - but still, shame??) And yes, the reason for the level of hate towards Marty and the legal outcome? ([i]no, rants about "spelt" and lost souls ?!? ... clear avoidance - [b]AGAIN[/b][/i])

[quote]lol ... first it was "been in board rooms throughout my career" ... and now you have been demoted to the lowest of the lows in IT - a SysAdmin ... that was a quick fall. Sadly even when you say "Systems Admin" your own references say "DESKTOP SUPPORT ADMIN" ... isn't that like being the lacky of a SysAdmin - so lower than the lowest of the lows. [/quote] Thanks for posting a link to a company I worked for in 2006. LinkedIn is great... no? You know nothing of IT. If you did, you would know my title was not the "lowest of the low" in 2006. Let alone what I do in 2014. Again. You are going #offtopic. Desktop support is thing that most System Administrators go through. Its part of the career path. You would know that, if you had a career, other than your many WOW alts.... [quote]In your role as DESKTOP SUPPORT ... did they have desktops in that board room ... this is classic self delusion. Perhaps we should check with them direct, just to see if they would back your "board room" support?[/quote] You don't get it. But I understand your frustration. I don't blame you for the personal attacks. Its all you have at this point. Your original topic (the one you keep saying we should stick to) was so wrong by your, there is no recourse. You have been pwned. [quote]So what did you mean then when you posted "Having been in board rooms throughout my career, I can almost guarantee you that the current shareholders will not vote" ? You tried to make yourself out to be the BIG MAN ... somehow better than Marty ... somehow (guaranteed) knowing of voting actions and closed board room plays. A mere desktop support boi ... caught out in full (or is that fool) flight - lol.[/quote] That's quite the imagination you have there... and you call me delusional. I never compared myself to Marty. You have that obsession. You have a problem with image, self esteem, and confidence. It clearly plays out on this message board. All you have left is sorry attempts to bait me into playing your stalker game. No friends? No chance at happiness? I can clearly see why... [quote]Hey, I wasn't going to mention those web site visits ... you do have some obsessive habits, but I guess that's what you job allows for in its less social darken corners. Lets just write this "question" off as a cross post error, even though there are now a few more contacts we could all on to check out the depth for their joint amusement.[/quote] Lol. You have quite the imagination. Another #offtopic attack. Keep it up script kiddie. See where this gets you. [quote]And yet you have not ... why? In case you missed them, here they are again; - No answer to your false claims of board room experience? - No explanation for the self deception? - No justification for the photo-shopping shame? (signs of her facial paralysis, the smile - guessing cerebral palsy or stoke - but still, shame??) And yes, the reason for the level of hate towards Marty and the legal outcome? (no, rants about "spelt" and lost souls ?!? ... clear avoidance - AGAIN)[/quote] And I am calling on you to show me what you are talking about. PM if you have to. Send me my photoshopped pic. I already explained my boardroom experience. Why ask again? I have no self deception. I have been forthcoming. The only avoidance, is from you. You see, you keep going off topic from your own topic. Can you stick the OP you posted about... or will you continue to stalk my personal info? My guess is you cant. Your ego wont let you.

[quote]Desktop support is thing that most System Administrators go through.[/quote]Except lets look at that profile; [b]Systems Administrator[/b] - Tactronics So caught out lying [b]AGAIN[/b], calling yourself a SysAdmin when you was only a desktop monkey. And trying to hide your obvious shame will not work - lol, classic attempt though. [quote]Its part of the career path.[/quote]But not one that includes board room participation as you foolishly attempted to imply - more lies being caught out ... seeing a trend here. [quote]other than your many WOW alts[/quote]That's funny - mortally wounded. Shame your wrong again, more evidence of that SysAdmin [cough] "career" at work. [quote]Send me my photoshopped pic[/quote]It's the one on your (now hidden) profile. In the full image you are in a red dance hall with an older blond/grey lady. She has what appears to be a mis-formed smile (paralysis from cp/stroke?). So who is this mystery lady if not your mother (looks like you, discounting the paralysis)? And more to the point why did you cut her out of the shot - hurtful - why not take another shot? [quote]I already explained my boardroom experience[/quote]No, you claimed "[i]been in board rooms throughout my career[/i]" in some vain attempt to sound the big man/better than Marty ... when in fact you [have best] been summoned to fix a faulty cable. And now you have been shown to be a sad liar. [quote]I have no self deception. I have been forthcoming[/quote]No you have been caught out, the lie about your roles in past employers, the board level participation (no mention of being a board member on your official career profile - lol) So no answers = no surprise. And [b]AGAIN[/b] ... the avoidance of the core question - (the OP); [b]The reason for the level of hate towards Marty and the legal outcome?[/b] The only option that explains your behavior is jealousy. So jealous of Marty's success and his number of wins over bungie (and your obvious failure - even taking to lying about your own achievements ... and "community college" - lol).

Lets dice this up shall we? I'll keep score about the things you have been incorrect about in this next post. First your original point... You know... the one you keep asking me to stick to, even though you are all over the map. You have to be on some form antipsychotics. Destiny stock = Wrong! Type of shares re-issued = Wrong! (undetermined at this point) Marty being fired from "Bungie LLC" = Wrong! The legal case being related to Destiny The Game = Wrong! Now onto the personal attacks... You assuming my mother having a stroke = Wrong! You assuming the person cropped out of the picture is my mother = Wrong! It could be a friend, a relative, a spouse, a colleague, a stranger, [b]your [/b]mom (no stranger when I hop the pond), or a myriad of other people. But its definitely not my mother. Great imagination though. It explains a lot about your delirium. (I'll consider your challenge [b]FAILED[/b]. You could not supply me with the full picture. You [b]FAILED [/b]at this simple task) You are a [b]proven [/b]lair at this point and anything you say, to anyone, should be considered incorrect from the start. Thanks for doing it in public! You assuming me cropping her out of the shot somehow implies I am trying to hide something. = Wrong! You assuming that you need "Photoshop" to crop a picture = Wrong! You assuming my title at one of my former employers was a lie = Wrong! You assuming that a job I had in 2006 is still relevant = Wrong! You assuming because a person at some point had a desktop support role, that this person still has a desktop support role = Wrong! You thinking System Administrator is the "lowest of the low" in the IT field = Wrong! You assuming that a person in the IT field has never been in a board room... other than to fix equipment = Wrong! You assuming desktop support means you need an actual desktop = Wrong! (PS... a desktop is a desktop whether its on a tablet, laptop, or workstation). You assuming that "having been in boardrooms throughout my career" is equal to "voting as a board member" = Wrong! I already explained how I have been in the places. If your comprehension issues prevent you from understanding that... that's really your problem. Get some help for it. [quote]So no answers = no surprise.[/quote] This is another example of your comprehension/memory problems. I have answered nearly every question you have asked. So how do all the answers we can all scroll up to read = "no answers? How tough is it living with these mental problems every day? So... can you stay on the OP... or do you insist on this tedious delirious dialogue? You did request we stay on the OP [quote]Either than or get back on topic[/quote]... [quote]Now, are you sure you don't want to get back on topic?[/quote]... [quote]I CHOSE not to because it had NOTHING to do with the original topic, go check the thread subject[/quote] Yet you insist on stalking my LinkedIn page, make accusations about things you know nothing about (much like your original post), and any other delusions you chase after. You keep requesting to stay on topic. Why cant you follow your own request? Much like many posts above, you have been proven wrong in nearly every facet of your machinations. The only thing you have left, is to try to defame, or slander me, to make my correct points seem irrelevant. I don't know if its the chronic bad weather in Ireland, or a drinking problem, or a mental defect... but you are borderline crazy. This is the last you will hear from me. I cant follow you down into your abyss any further. I have better things to do with my time. See you starside guardian... well probably not. Different time zones, different consoles, difference of opinion. Slán leat friend. Its been... interesting.

[quote]First your original point...the one you keep asking me to stick to[/quote]No, gave up on trying to get you back on topic long ago ... funny how now you are in answer avoidance mode you want to return? [quote]You could not supply me with the full picture[/quote]The above should suffice - image trace is a great tool, can locate the original based on a simple link. Also got a whole bunch of other randoms, guessing they came up based on the device id (like those "[i]find my camera[/i]" sites). Remember you asked me for the photo - the only [b]FAIL[/b] here is why you couldn't find your own copy ... desktop support boi got no backups - lol. [quote]You assuming my title at one of my former employers was a lie = Wrong[/quote]No, your profile listed "SysAdmin", but your employer listed your role as "Desktop Support" ... and given your community college [cough] education I am guessing even your employer was being generous. [quote]a job I had in 2006 is still relevant = Wrong[/quote]Hey ... it was [b]YOU[/b] who provided it as one (of only 3) reference jobs (lol - [i]you who claimed careers in the board room[/i]). [quote]You assuming because a person at some point had a desktop support role, that this person still has a desktop support role = Wrong![/quote]Classic ... so now you admit that your profile listing it as SysAdmin was a lie ... little late, but nice confession. [quote]You assuming that a person in the IT field has never been in a board room[/quote]No, just [b]YOU[/b]. Again you provide no reference of this in your profile - no mention of your board room success - nothing. And given your ability to overstate your desktop support role it is hardly down to modesty. [quote]you insist on stalking my LinkedIn page[/quote]No, you made false claims - I called you out - you asked for proof - I provided. Same now with the photo - you asked, I provided. Unlike you - still waiting for an answer for the photo shop efforts. No matter what shame you have, she looks like a genuine person. Why not select another photo rather than cut someone out so coldly. You boasted "[url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/68573576][i]If you ask, I will answer[/i][/url]" ... and yet no answer :( [quote]chronic bad weather in Ireland[/quote]lol ... so far you have claimed I am American, British and now Irish ... and you claim not to be the lowest of the lows in IT ... and yet continue to prove yourself wrong and lacking any IT ability. Not from Ireland either, and question if you have ever been? Looked at the whether position in Ireland and saw "[i]Dry and bright in most areas this afternoon with some sunshine[/i]" - looks like you are making assumptions [b]AGAIN[/b] :( [quote]This is the last you will hear from me. I have better things to do with my time[/quote]Time ... what the last 14 days - doesn't sound like "[i]better things[/i]" ... sounds more like a looser in retreat. Plus we still have to find out about the mystery lady, and your stubborn denial of her. If it wasn't for the issues with her right eye, her smile and aged hands she could be an older sister - but still would put money on your mother (maybe with you an awkward teenage pregnancy?) Come on ... you promised an answer.