-
Battlefield 3 is pretty garbage on PC. Battlelog is a -blam!-ing joke.
-
That's what everybody says, but once you get past the fact they shove it down your throat, you can choose to ignore it, or use quite the service.
-
My biggest problem with it is the server browser is a piece of shit.
-
Not really. Xbox One and PS4 can pull 64 players, HD, and 60fps. A PC that will play BF3 on 60FPS at HD is gonna' cost about 200 more than the Xbox One.
-
I keep telling people, 64 players isn't the only problem. It's more that everything is extremely imprecise on console.
-
You mean like using your Mouse precise?
-
Editado por Shogg: 8/16/2013 6:08:18 PMMouse, Servers instead of a shitty excuse for a Matchmaking system, LOD/Render distance etc
-
They have Server Lists on Xbox One too. There's only no servers for the other platforms.
-
So? At 400 dollars less, you can actually play the game at 60FPS at 1080P and higher. And that's just on Xbox One. With PS4, it's 500 dollars less. IMO, Console servers are just fine which doesn't even matter because the game will have dedicated servers wherever you are. Though the biggest thing, is that the communities on Consoles are much more social and it's easier to track and add friends.
-
64 players was the only significant difference IMO. Now that consoles have that I'm definitely going to prefer playing there. I don't really care if my game isn't maxed out on ultra.
-
Basically until new details are shown about Battlefield 4 on PC basically next-gen and PC versions of BF4 will be very similar
-
You need to watch the new battlefield friends.
-
Editado por OliG: 8/10/2013 12:12:18 PMWhy? Same amount of fun. More players =/= more fun. If anything, level playing field = more fun Controller = more comfortable than keyboard, and if you use a controller on PC, you're fecked. Still, I fixed your comment; Battlefield is a joke, period.
-