I thought it was the other way around. There seem to be a lot of improvements coming with forsaken.
English
-
I don't care about random rolls. In fact I hate RNG in general and would prefer that you give me a path to grind to upgrade my weapons, rather than just HOPING that I'll get one that offers what I want. Crucible is still shit. Period. Prestige raids lairs are an absolutely joke. Jumping puzzles are way over done and not needed in a decent raid. Total lack of planning in raids to ensure a mixed team with different skills things like the weapon slot changes are nice, but not core to what is wrong with the game, and too little too late for me.
-
Same i prefer that weapon stats stay the same, random rolls means i will have to put more time into this game, which i don’t plan too
-
I don't think you get it. There shouldn't be (a lot of improvements coming.) They should have already been there.
-
So they should keep it the same then?
-
His point is that the game shouldn't NEED to have improvements done when they had 3 years of working out the problems with D1. Then D2 came out, shit the bed, and now they are scrambling to try and bring back the feel that people liked in D1.
-
So.... there is no point then? What relevance does that have at this point?
-
Is this supposed to be a trick question?
-
Well you seem to see the improvement as a bad thing..
-
No, I see things that could have been added to the game a while back. Improvements are never a bad thing, but using some of the improvements to sell an expansion is not a good thing. No one really knows how them improvements will effect the game especially with Bungie's track record. Sounds good on paper...
-
Well the random rolls, changes to weapon loadouts snd other stuff are coming whether or not you have the expansion. They aren't really selling those items.
-
I feel the same way about my 8 month old. Little SoB should already be talking and walking and working a job. It's bullshit that I have to wait for his ass to grow and learn. I hope you have the ability to see your argument repurposed and realize the logical fallacy of which you are guilty.
-
Not even close. A baby comes out the same for everyone, with no history to build on. D2 came with 4 years of history and pre-work to build off, and yet it was a total joke.
-
Your child has ADD . You need to get him/her on some some kind of pill.
-
Well you didnt have your child for 3 years watch it grow and learn to then reset it back to a featus to slowly watch it learn back all the things it had before. It was a pretty silly comparison.
-
Two thumbs up for you sir 👍👍
-
Editado por Konungr-Kaiden: 7/31/2018 3:33:40 AMNot really. Bungie's only mistake was listening to its whiny, entitled playerbase and streamers. Also, it was not an analogy. It was taking his logic and putting it into another scenario. That is how you can tell if the logic is strong or flawed. A logical argument always works. A fallacy is always wrong. Am I the only -blam!-ing person who took advanced logic in college?
-
That's exactly what an analogy is. [quote]a·nal·o·gy əˈnaləjē/Submit noun a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification. "an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies" a correspondence or partial similarity. "the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia" a thing that is comparable to something else in significant respects. "works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"[/quote]
-
Editado por N00bMaster69: 7/31/2018 7:09:46 AMSounds like you need to retake that class. Using the logic from one scenario and then putting into a different one isn't showing them how bad their way of thinking is when that sort of logic doesn't apply to that situation at all. For example let's say someone makes money in the stock market they are telling everyone that they have to spend money to make money, it's then like me saying "well I spent £2000 on McDonald's burgers yesterday and I haven't made any money on them yet, you're wrong" still the same logic "spend money to make money" but I haven't proved that their way of thinking is wrong just because in the example l gave that way of thinking didn't work.
-
Cute, but not quite.
-
For someone that thinks they have a good concept of logic you sure don't seem to use any, go on then explain to me how what I said was wrong, this ought to be a laugh.
-
You can't afford me. I don't teach for free.
-
Yeah this was the sort of reply I was expecting, no actual real argument, one of those people.
-
Says the guy with no argument...
-
I've explained in 2 previous replies why I think your way of thinking is wrong and I've yet to get one back from you, what are you on about?
-
Go back to the crackpipe, mate.