He did worse then a jab he flat out gave zero f**ks about a probably fairly big portion of the player base which is far worse then a jab. Who cares about presentation other then you? May have not intended malice but gave a giant middle finger to people who would rather not camp control points as the only way to get kill bounties done. So malice or not is your only reason for not bringing that up with him seems kinda flawed there never said as hard you just flat out don't bring that up at all him.
English
-
Editado por unspoken threats: 4/2/2016 8:46:42 AM[quote]If you want an idea to come to fruition try making your own thread. That way you can be as considerate as you wish and nobody will possibly ever in a million -blam!-ing years think of something you may have forgotten or give perspective that slipped you. Or maybe you should learn what a germinal idea is[/quote] We're going in circles because you're not comprehending that ideas need suggestions to become optimized. Keep blaming his oversight of your needs and I'll keep reverting back to how childish you sound. [quote]Other ideas?[/quote] - Carnival in original post. That was your chance to not be defensive and convey your resistance passively.
-
Not oversight of my needs oversight of not giving a crap about a good portion of the community plain and simple dont see how that's childish but w/e your opinion. If he wants to do a massive overhaul of how kill bounties work in IB he should have foreseen that his ways alienate a portion of the community. By the way thanks you helped me afk through most of a IB match for a exotic engram.
-
So you're suggesting he intentionally was partisan of play styles? He already told you it was just an idea. And he's not Bungie. They're not going to say "CarnivalLaw had this idea so let's do it." That's exactly how you sound. As if his [i]proposal[/i] is written in stone. It's not. Peace bro.
-
Well he intentionally proposed removing all kill bounties excluding ones on capture points so yeah that would affect peoples play styles so yes he did intentionally. Did I ever say it wasn't idea and of course hes not bungie anyone can see that. Never said it was written in stone or that they would implement them all along just maintained his change of kill bounties is a horrible idea even he stopped defending that a long time ago which insinuates he knows he was wrong. Oh, so your that guy who uses the word bro.
-
Again, oversight. You have trust issues, bro.
-
Far more then oversight but since you seem to do nothing but defend him when he intentionally proposed ideas that alienate a portion of the community it's clear why you think it's simply oversight.
-
-blam!- it. I'll ask for you: Carnival - are you intentionally meaning to alienate a player base that would prefer to not play the objective or could compounding bounties, as KungLao proposed, be something you're interested in seeing? We can wait for a response now and you don't have to have trust issues any longer.
-
Why don't YOU ask him if you want clarification instead of believing your untruths.
-
He abandoned this thread long ago. And how is it untrue he stated hes sick of how people play control and would want to see bounties that only conform to his point of view of how bounties should work to be implemented that's not oversight. But feel free to keep defending him by not calling him out on things but rather attack me I mean you were the one who really pointed out the alienating of people yet you haven't spoken up elsewhere.
-
Editado por unspoken threats: 4/2/2016 9:39:09 AM[quote]Other ideas?[/quote] Seems pretty open ended. Keep circling the arguments. We're starting to look like the Dreamcast symbol. Edit: I bumped KungLao's proposal and explained why. I agree both should be implemented. If you really want to be heard reply to Cozmo.
-
Other ideas only thing listed there are 4 new bounties like the rest of his focus on alienating how people play because he doesn't like how everyone plays control. There have been others with ideas but when he abandons a thread like a deadbeat dad avoiding child support there's a reason why it only has 4 things. Also we're supposed to supply him with the ideas to the main point of his argument to not exclude a decent size chunk of the community? He would never add those he only lists things that conform to his view of how the map should be played and just blows off anyone who doesn't support his ideas.