{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/9/2013 12:50:21 AM
1
No, hes acted legally and people who don't appreciate civil society and morality want to ruin his life.
English
-
I don't care how moral or civil those people are. He took an action, and regardless of its morality, he got screwed. His quality of life will be crap; he should have gone non-lethal.
-
Yep when someone's bashing your head you should politely ask them to stop lol.
-
Or use a non-lethal weapon and not ruin the rest of your life.
-
It will only ruin his life because criminal sympathizers bitch and complain.
-
I don't want to have to say this again: Whether or not the shooting was justified is irrelevant. The morality of this has [b]NOTHING[/b] to do with what I'm saying, so just forget it. What I am trying to say is that in this age, if you kill someone for ANY REASON, you are going to get screwed. Zimmerman killed someone, therefore he is going to get screwed even if he goes free. Because of this, he should have gone non-lethal unless he enjoys ruining the rest of his life. It's that simple.
-
-blam!- that if it was justified he has no reason to fear.
-
...Did you even read what I just wrote?
