-
[quote]This a joke?[/quote]Why would this be a joke? The unimportant blue parts of the map have a significantly lower population and don't matter as much economically. Their voice shouldn't be equal to mine.
-
What happens to your economy when the blue part stops feeding those cities?
-
[quote]What happens to your economy when the blue part stops feeding those cities?[/quote] Why would they do that?
-
Because the small number of elites controlling those cities wouldn't represent them without incentive. That's why our system is the way it is.
-
[quote]Because the small number of elites controlling those cities wouldn't represent them without incentive. That's why our system is the way it is.[/quote] Why would people in the city have different needs than those outside the city?
-
Some would say too many people in the city are like kept pets. Depended on handouts. Just sayin.
-
[quote]Some would say too many people in the city are like kept pets. Depended on handouts. Just sayin.[/quote] Don't more rural areas use federal assistance than cities?
-
Based on common sensical thinking that should be totally false. I may be wrong, but I'm probably not.
-
metro counties receive more federal dollars than rural counties. Not only more per county but more per capita
-
[quote]metro counties receive more federal dollars than rural counties. Not only more per county but more per capita[/quote] Source? Not that I don't think it's possible, I just want to be correct when I say things, and don't want to repeat false information
-
Edited by Kamots: 7/26/2017 12:39:12 AMPercentage: Rural>Urban. Edit: fix for precision
-
US Dept of Agriculture Economic Research Service
-
[quote]US Dept of Agriculture Economic Research Service[/quote]I'm clicking on your source but nothing is happening.
-
Rural has more areas. Urban has more people.