{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/16/2019 11:39:35 PM
16
-
I assume you mean a left libertarian. Otherwise I will laugh at you. Imagine being a right-leaning libertarian.
-
Laugh all you want
-
I will. You’re trying to be proud of hating poor people, but in a different way.
-
Since when do I hate poor people?
-
You're a libertarian, it's kinda implied.
-
One only has to agree with one party more than he agrees with another party to be considered part of that party. He identifies more with right-leaning libertarians. That does not mean that he agrees with everything that right-leaning libertarians do. He just agrees with them more than he agrees with other parties.
-
There is nothing good about right libertarians.
-
Ok. Does he hate poor people? No? I’m sure you could find one characteristic that he shares with right libertarians.
-
Libertarians as a party enact policies that actively hurt poor people, full well knowing the impact of their policies. I find it hard to believe that they don't hate people based on that.
-
Ah. I see. Now which of those policies do you think would apply to Boo Moment?
-
Any of the ones that line up with right libertarians.
-
Great. Why not say those instead of saying he hated/hates poor people?
-
Things like cutting government spending on social security, healthcare, education in favor of lining rich people’s pockets all qualify.
-
Ask him if he is for those things. Or at least say that he is, and wait for him to confirm so that you may provide evidence for your theory.
-
If you are a right leaning Libertarian, then you agree with those things, if you do not, you don't, he has already said that he is a right leaning Libertarian, and as such, it is implied that he agrees with them.
-
