If you think halo 2 had the worst campaign you have autism sorry but the tests conform it
English
-
[quote]If you think halo 2 had the worst campaign you have autism sorry but the tests conform it[/quote] [quote]conform it[/quote] The irony. Anyways, yeah, I do. And I'm not alone. [url=http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/better-than-halo-the-making-of-halo-2-article] Even Bungie thinks Halo 2's campaign was lame.[/url] I'll say it again, from a story perspective only, yes, Halo 2 is important to the series. The Covenant civil war makes no sense without it. But the Arbiter missions aren't fun. The game starts going downhill as soon as the Chief leaves Earth, and ending the game on an abrupt cliffhanger as the Arbiter was lame. There was no place in Halo for boss fights, which, wouldn't you know it? is the same mistake that 343 makes with Halo 5. The multiplayer saved Halo 2. Multiplayer might save Halo 5.
-
Bungie also made the garbage game we call destiny that has little to no story and complete garbage multiplayer, your logic is flawed
-
[quote]Bungie also made the garbage game we call destiny that has little to no story and complete garbage multiplayer, your logic is flawed[/quote] The same garbage game you've played for 750+ hours? Which averages out to just about 2 hours a day since the game was released? That garbage game? Before you say something stupid like, "Destiny was the only game out for a year," I don't hate myself enough to play a game I think is garbage for 2 hours a day, every day, for a year, and trust me, I have self-loathing to spare. I would've taken up knitting or gone to therapy or some shit. Look, man, you can like what you like, and I'm excited for H5's multiplayer, but you're either trolling or lying to yourself if you think H5's story was executed well and doesn't introduce numerous plot holes into previous games.