{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/8/2018 2:40:05 PM
17
Losing 70% of the playercount after half a year is normal for most games.
If i have everything in a game and have done everything i dont really see a reason to keep playing.
English
-
No it isnt normal for most games unless the game has seriously problems. Stop trying to make excuses for a shitty reskin from a shitty developer
-
It is what happens after 6 months of a game release Tell you what kid prove me wrong with actual evidence and stats NOT with just you pretending you know best. And not just 1 example. We need several games to prove you right and me wrong so we can form an average and then... only then can you be right.
-
Edited by Blump: 2/9/2018 1:49:04 PMHow about this. Although it only goes back to August 2016, it is an independent population scrape with. This graph show the counts added (PvE added to PvP) from August 2016 through Jan 16. At the time the post was created the counts were comparable to Moments of Triumph in D1, however they have dropped further since then and are now lower than the combined daily unique player count at the end of D1. https://www.reddit.com/r/DestinyTheGame/comments/7rsnau/i_was_bored_so_i_scraped_destinytrackers_archive/
-
Siege has gained over 50 thousand players playing monthly on average since launch. It’s had several years of development since launch, but if you look at the stats, it’s player base only increases each year. I know you asked for multiple examples but I don’t feel like putting in the time for more than that. If this was bungies first time around I would probably forgive them. It’s not, so I personally won’t spend another cent on destiny or any of its sequels or dlc. End game forums are legit though.
-
Fail. Seige had a very low player base to start with and has a high amount of cost involved. It's road has been rockier than Destinys. You cant be arsed to look because the only example you could find was a weak assed one that shoes nothing. Muted for being lazy and being unable to hold a coherent areguement. What a failure.
-
Edited by nosliW: 2/9/2018 8:22:51 PMMute away dumbass. Siege did have a rocky start, no where did I say that it didn’t. But the player count for siege has been on the rise not on the decline. I would mute you too but I would rather taste your salty tears. High cost involved for siege? Lol maybe at launch. The game is 40 bucks now. The only way you will pay a shit ton of money for it is if you buy the seasons pass. No point in that, who cares about getting the new operators a week in advance, not I. Grinding for reknown is super easy. I typically have enough reknown to buy 3-4 operators and fully max out their kits on season release. Your argument is the failure buddy, you’re a fan boy. I bet you lost those gag reflexes on bungies dick eh?
-
I am just stating well known facts. No need to get mad .
-
No you are not stating facts, you’re stating what you want to hear. Bungie had three years of feedback from D1, this game should of been a home run. Instead they just shat out a lazy reskin
-
You are saying that like it is the only game that does this. And most sequels are reskins. And star wars battlefront 1/2 are the most laziest reskins of last year . Everything in those games is worse than the game they are based upon.
-
Stop deflecting, and stay on topic, unless you are incapable of doing that. Not all sequels are reskins: Halo 2 had new weapons, locations, new armor, new enemies, tons of new bells and whistles that made all the enemies unique from each other. Gears of war 2 did the same thing. Destiny 2 is the laziest reskins ever.
-
Destiny 2 has. New weapons... New enemies. New locations. New abilities. And those are facts.
-
Oh, and only one new ability: A reskinned version of blade dancer A reskinned version of hammer of sol for the warlock The only new thing is the captain america shield for the titan Obvious bias is obvious randy
-
Supers are not the only abilities. Thanks for proving that you are the biased one here.
-
You have done nothing but deflect and spin a fairy tale to make it sound like this shitty game is an “improvement” The only biased one here is you, sorry you cant handle the facts
-
I never said it was an improvement. I said most sequels are for the most part reskins. Further proving you are biased by putting words in my mounth. Keep it up...maybe you will think of something original.
-
Again, you deflect lol Supers can be classified as abilities, but thats what they are. Sorry you cant handle facts because your fandom also classified as a fragile ego. This game is a shit stained disaster, 80% of the player base that has left knows it and wall street also knows it.
-
Lol no it doesnt: D2 has: The same enemies, reskinned New locations The same weapon models, reskinned Lackluster exotics A slightly better story than D1 Shitty raid with shitty loot Only two new weapon models, reskinned across the board Those are the ACTUAL facts, again, quit trying to spin a fairy tale that you WANT to hear lol
