{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/3/2016 4:18:40 PM
3
Here's a set of assumptions that you made.
1. A watch is complex (no arguments here)
2. A watch has a watchmaker (well, duh)
3. The universe is also complex (alright)
4. Therefore, the universe must have a watchmaker. (Lolwut)
Look at that last step. Using that exact same logic, I'm gonna make me a set of assumptions
1. Leaves are complex cellulose structures.
2. Leaves grow on trees.
3. Money is also a complex cellulose structure
4. Therefore, money grows on trees.
English
-
No, it just implies that money has a maker. Which would be humans.
-
[quote]Here's a set of assumptions that you made. 1. A watch is complex (no arguments here) 2. A watch has a watchmaker (well, duh) 3. The universe is also complex (alright) 4. Therefore, the universe must have a watchmaker. (Lolwut) Look at that last step. Using that exact same logic, I'm gonna make me a set of assumptions 1. Leaves are complex cellulose structures. 2. Leaves grow on trees. 3. Money is also a complex cellulose structure 4. Therefore, money grows on trees.[/quote]
-
Excellent way to show the false analogy
