True Activision has been at it longer than bungle, but their failures are on par, if not worse than Activision. Bungle has only been doing this on their own for a short while and they already have made a sizable portion of their players angry with them. Then they went on vacation instead of fixing issues. That to me is worse than anything Activision has done
English
-
Well, sorry but it's not even close to what activision has pulled. Like I mentioned, the hong kong situation, the mw remastered paywall, the rampant lootbox additions, which AREN'T purely cosmetic by the way. If it's as bad as you say it is, then we should expect more coverage and people hammering bungie. Harder than what acti/bliz got for their "oopsie."
-
The only thing Activision has over bungle is the Hong Kong incident. Bungle has all those others. Plus the throttling xp incident , the health Regen incident that was a 'glitch' that they just happened to keep. Also the 'glitch' that continually directs players to their cash shop
-
Oh so now you want to admit Activision has done worst now after I've repeated brought up the hong kong incident. Okay. What about hiding modern warfare behind infinite warfare? Or are you just going to ignore that too?
-
Hiding modern warfare behind infinite war far was their call. Nothing bad about it. You want the game, you need to buy the bundle. That's how things work some times.
-
Bruh stop trolling me. You and I both know how bad IW is.
-
Sure do, IW was probably about as bad of a sequel to a franchise as D2 was to destiny
-
Iw wasn't a sequel? It was just a game that sold only because it was included in a bundle with a better game.
-
Certainly agreed. D2 only sold because it was riding off the name from a better game as well
-
And because of forsaken. And because it's fanbase keeps coming back.
-
Same with CoD. And CoD has better numbers
-
It's MW. What did you expect?
-
Look at the video's dislike ratio.