{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/24/2017 4:33:12 PM
5
[quote]Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.[/quote]
Nuclear option
English
-
[quote][quote]Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.[/quote] Nuclear option[/quote] Tbh idk what that means
-
[quote][quote][quote]Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.[/quote] Nuclear option[/quote] Tbh idk what that means[/quote] During obamas first term, Harry Reid had the senate majority and made a rule he called the nuclear option. Instead of requiring 62 votes to confirm an appointed nominee he could invoke his new rule and only require 50 votes. Now that I think of it I don't think it pertains to scouts nominees.
-
[quote][quote][quote][quote]Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.[/quote] Nuclear option[/quote] Tbh idk what that means[/quote] During obamas first term, Harry Reid had the senate majority and made a rule he called the nuclear option. Instead of requiring 62 votes to confirm an appointed nominee he could invoke his new rule and only require 50 votes. Now that I think of it I don't think it pertains to scouts nominees.[/quote] Oh I know it as the filibuster rule
-
[quote][quote][quote][quote][quote]Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.[/quote] Nuclear option[/quote] Tbh idk what that means[/quote] During obamas first term, Harry Reid had the senate majority and made a rule he called the nuclear option. Instead of requiring 62 votes to confirm an appointed nominee he could invoke his new rule and only require 50 votes. Now that I think of it I don't think it pertains to scouts nominees.[/quote] Oh I know it as the filibuster rule[/quote] Yes. Here's the correct info https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.rt.com/document/58d450a0c36188920e8b4626/amp
-
[quote][quote][quote][quote][quote][quote]Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.[/quote] Nuclear option[/quote] Tbh idk what that means[/quote] During obamas first term, Harry Reid had the senate majority and made a rule he called the nuclear option. Instead of requiring 62 votes to confirm an appointed nominee he could invoke his new rule and only require 50 votes. Now that I think of it I don't think it pertains to scouts nominees.[/quote] Oh I know it as the filibuster rule[/quote] Yes. Here's the correct info https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.rt.com/document/58d450a0c36188920e8b4626/amp[/quote] Ya I know they can overturn the filibuster rule though it's not Constitutional in the first place
