Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.
English
#Offtopic
-
31 RespuestasBecause republicans stole a seat that was rightfully obamas to fill.
-
1 RespuestaI just want to know why Democrats think he's such a threat now and not before.
-
2 RespuestasAs a repercussion to the actions taken last year by Republicans in Congress. He's not a terrible judge, but he was lobbied for pretty heavily by conservative groups. He's so-so.
-
3 RespuestasBecause Garland should have been confirmed. Nothing personal.
-
Because when we go low.......they also go low! Childish tit for tat politics is the only way to get things done don't you know?
-
1 RespuestaI just want judges that are as fair as possible. But then again I don't really keep up on judges anymore.
-
2 Respuestas[quote]Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.[/quote] Perfect judge lol tell that to man who's child had autism. And the supreme overturned that case
-
1 RespuestaHe is going to be the pick no matter what so democrats should stop delaying things
-
4 RespuestasObama wasn't allowed to appoint a nominee in his last year as president. Trump shouldn't be allowed to either.
-
Because they were 100 percent certain Hillary would be president and thought this pick was gonna set SCOTUS under liberal control for a generation. Then it was taken away.
-
5 Respuestas[quote]Why is your party so against the Supreme Court pick? He's a perfect judge, the only reason I can think of that Democrats don't want him is because he won't push an ideological agenda.[/quote] Nuclear option
-
4 RespuestasI don't affiliate myself with either party but I don't approve of Gorsuch because of his actions during the "frozen trucker" case
-
1 RespuestaJust keep it empty for the next 4-8 years
-
10 RespuestasThe democrats gave him a hearing. I think that's enough for about a year. Maybe even 4. I know it sux but at least he got more than what Garland got.