I 3Dot I There appears to be a glaring double standard in the example you provided. The way I interpret your scenario is if one player in the fireteam of two goes afk he/she won't be kicked due simply to the fact that he/she is in a fireteam. So what you have there is the random solo player who is actively participating in the strike, having to contend with an afk player who isn't going to get kicked from the strike only because they matchmade as part of a team of two. But if the solo player, if I have this right, engages in the exact same afk behaviour then he/ she will be kicked as an inactive player, not just for being afk, but for being afk as a solo player. Why should the member of the fireteam of two get a free pass for being afk while the solo random does not ??? There is the double standard. Its just as big an inconvenience to the solo player if one of the team of two goes afk, as it is for them if the solo player goes afk. Also from the solo players perspective, the other two players who entered the strike as a fireteam of two are also just two random players, so what happens if the fireteam of two both go afk ??? According to your example they won't get kicked as inactive players because they are safe under the umbrella of being in a fireteam, which leaves the random solo player having to run the strike alone or just leave. Yet another example is what if all three players in your scenario go afk ??? The two in the fireteam will be safe because they matchmade as a fireteam of two but the solo player will get kicked as an inactive because he/she matchmade as a solo player. How is that fair ??? The afk rules need to apply to all players in the strike or none at all. Although one possible exception would be if players matchmade as a full fireteam of three. Apologies for the long post.