You dont need dlc to enjoy it dlc adds some singleplayr missions and some raids
English
-
It adds story. Which literally means they are selling an incomplete game if the story isn't even fully available.
-
So Halo 2 wasnt a complete game?
-
Actually no, it wasn't. If you watch the bungie doc they say they literally had to cut off the end of the game.
-
So then neither was Halo 3
-
[quote]It adds story. Which literally means they are selling an incomplete game if the story isn't even fully available.[/quote] So according to your logic, wow, fallout, dead island, infamous, etc, etc.... Are all incomplete games? Any time a developer adds content it makes the original "incomplete"?
-
Story should never be sold as a seperate piece. That's like buying half a book and posting another 20 for the rest like 3 months later.
-
[quote]Story should never be sold as a seperate piece. That's like buying half a book and posting another 20 for the rest like 3 months later.[/quote] So the Harry potter series, song of ice and fire, inheritance cycle, and others are ripping you off?
-
Its different when the book has a definitive ending leading into a sequel. Sequels in video games are different from expansion packs - Destiny has a lot more than the single player element to it, so why not make DLC purely for that and leave the story to the sequels? DLCing story in video games just seems wrong. Hell DLC in general seems wrong. Back to my thing about books, DLC is the equivalent of buying the last 10-20 pages of the first book. Not a sequel to that book.
-
I'll just agree to disagree with you, I don't see it your way. I have no problem forking out 40$ a year for more of a game I love playing(this first one is a gamble, I know I haven't played gold version). It's better than what they are doing to the console diablo 3 players, $60 for an expansion that takes a week to beat! Lol
-
Yup. Exactly.
-
Yhe main story is completed with the normal campaign, this adds only more info that is not necesary but fun to know.