{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/29/2014 12:05:10 AM
3
Hitler was a great leader.
He was a pathetic excuse for a human being, but he [i]was[/i] a great leader.
[spoiler]Answers that aren't Hitler: Napoleon, Charlemagne, Alexander the Great, Mao Zedong, George Washington, Julius Ceaser. [/spoiler]
English
-
Honestly, I'd put Napoleon on par with Hitler (as far as leadership prowess goes). Hitler simply had more technology and a war-weary world. But Hitler was, ultimately, not a great tactician. He inundated his command chain with red tape that very well may have won him the war if otherwise.
-
I never said Hitler was better than the other leaders I listed. I was just addressing the OP. I totally agree that Napoleon and Hitler are on par.
-
OOOOOOH! I read it as "Answers that others would give but are to be ignored because they aren't 'Hitler'" Which I admit is a tremendously less likely interpretation, but Hey it's the Flood.
