{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/21/2014 4:43:55 PM
50
I am concerned for 2016
This article discusses how gender would be Clinton's #1 deciding factor on whether or not people vote for her. And according to the article, she has the most chance of becoming the first female president because of this. Am I the only one who thinks that voting for someone because of what gender they are is the stupidest possible decision? Let's just ignore the fact that she's a gun-grabbing, manipulative lunatic and elect her based on gender. Where, let's face it, she would have mood swings, be unable to negotiate well with other leaders for her being a woman, and not be taken very seriously by the Americans who know that a woman with power is dangerous.
English
#Offtopic
-
ronpaul2016
-
1 RespuestaDemocracy really brings out the retardation in the people.
-
Oh, I read this as "I am confirmed for 2016", as if the OP was running for president.
-
12 RespuestasWhy is it that only Americans think that not giving gun to lunatics is a bag thing?
-
2 RespuestasYou had a point till you mentioned her being inferior to men as a leader. Voting for someone on race/gender/faith/etc is stupid. Listen to their policies.
-
She looks older than my 85 year old grandmother.
-
It's absolutely dumb. Just voting or not voting for someone based on the color of their skin. Our country is -blam!-ed.
-
bill was just hillary's puppet so its coo
-
Dude, about 50% of every American who's entitled to vote actually does so.
-
2 RespuestasRon Paul for president
-
2 RespuestasEven if that moron Hillary doesn't win we'll just get another moron that's just as bad. If you think choosing the other side is the solution then you still haven't figured out the problem.
-
6 Respuestas>Men being competent leaders >Men being civil >Men not throwing temper tantrums to the point of derailing our entire country over personal interests pick 0
-
We had our female head of government. Got that shit out of our system; although she was pretty much universally hated.
-
16 RespuestasEditado por NoelKannagi: 3/21/2014 5:56:04 PMWell, women are better than men, so this is not a huge problem. Natalia-chan for president 2016.
-
[quote]Where, let's face it, she would have mood swings, be unable to negotiate well with other leaders for her being a woman, and not be taken very seriously by the Americans who know that a woman with power is dangerous.[/quote] Huh, didn't Hillary Clinton already go through Menopause? Also, this is blatant sexism.
-
Introducing, the gender card!
-
4 RespuestasReported for sexism.
-
2 RespuestasI hate politics and all it's bullshit, I'm never voting.
-
If you don't vote for her you're automatically sexist and support a sexist society.
-
7 RespuestasWho even bothers to think that far? Damn it's early 2014.
-
Prepare for the Feminazi movement.
-
1 RespuestaOf course she would use her gender. And because of her gender, she'll be voted in to send us further into the endless shit pit. ... Just as people voted Obama 'cause he was black. (or civil rights [euphemism])
-
[quote]Where, let's face it, she would have mood swings, be unable to negotiate well with other leaders for her being a woman, and not be taken very seriously by the Americans who know that a woman with power is dangerous.[/quote] And the shitpost of the day goes to...
-
3 RespuestasI love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning
-
It's ridiculous that people are voting for her just because she's female.
-
-blam!- democracy, Communism master race!
