{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/21/2014 12:26:36 PM
3
Honestly ???
So why did the game fall from the charts so quickly?
Why, even after record game sales, did people stop playing it so quickly?
It was either the engine or the way bungie worked the game layers ... you pick.
English
-
You are, in my opinion, the best troll out here.
-
Hey everyone ... look its [b]Hawkeeeeee[/b]. The fool who sucked up to bungie with his forum tag ... only to have it made fun of by bungie themselves in a weekly update. The fool who takes 22 days to reply to a post. And as a real troll; - does not refute a single point - provides no supportive argument nor links Can only assume that the butthurt from the weekly update slam down is still burning stong ... that and his troll ban has now expired and he is free to return :(
-
What lmao no
-
People don't stop playing a game because of the engine. People stopped playing the game because they didn't like the things Bungie added. Plain and simple. The engine is perfectly fine. Even more so in Halo 4.
-
[quote]The engine is perfectly fine[/quote]Everyone knew bungie was planning on tanking the game. The combination of anger and threat that they would have to compete against it with destiny. But rather than rely on your opinion lets read what Activision throught to be an appropriate way to control bungies rage within the [url=http://documents.latimes.com/bungie-activision-contract]contract[/url]; "[i]Reach fails to score a game rating of at least eighty (80) one (1) month after release; or if retail sales of Halo: Reach on a sell-in basis have not reached at least six miilion (6,000,000) units during the first six (6) months[/i]" So why would Activision try to protect Microsoft ... they didn't, they new through a close working association with bungie that sabotage was a very possible outcome.
-
Editado por Deleted User: 3/23/2014 1:20:38 PMLol you talk about Reach tanking which it didnt until almost two years after. But what about halo 4 with populations lower than any mainstream halo? The biggest drop off to date 3 months. Why you bring up engines is beyond me. 343 took all the garbage bungie brought and made it worse lol. Turned halo into perks and randomness 4. Instead of arena game that had a few flaws like bloom and armor lock. At least reach had a ranked playlist out of the box. 343i is so out of touch with its community when people like us tried to tell them. Trust us they said we know halo fans. Two years later sorry guys we hired guys who hate halo.
-
[quote]Lol you talk about Reach tanking which it didnt until almost two years after[/quote]Ok lets look at your claim; [url=http://majornelson.com/2010/09/30/live-activity-for-week-of-sept-20th/]At launch it hit #1[/url] [url=http://majornelson.com/2010/11/18/live-activity-for-week-of-nov-8/]Next published count (by the end of the following month) - fallen to #3[/url] and yes, there was a poll in the 2 weeks between which showed that reach had fallen, but bungie cried foul and so Major Nelson removed the link. Now ... time for you to link to proof that show lolReach took two years to fall from the #1 spot. [quote]But what about halo 4 with populations lower than any mainstream halo[/quote]After people play lolReach, and on hearing it was to use the same engine - what do you expect? Only so much lipstick you can stick on that pig. [quote]Trust us they said we know halo fans[/quote]Given that people have still not returned to lolReach on mass proves you wrong. Your (or my) opinions count for nothing - but a check of the UU counts show that the majority of people continue to play H4 over lolReach ... the truth hurts, but you can't deny it.
-
Editado por Deleted User: 3/25/2014 12:41:51 AMHoly -blam!- you cant argue with someone who is pants on head. The numbers actually do prove my point. Halo reach held its own in numbers three for two years the population was about 100,000 on at one time for a year and a half. By six months halo 4 had dropped from 300,000 on at one time to less than 12,000 dipping lower than halo 3 lol. Who reallycares if reach wasnt number one. Cod has been for the last 5 years. Halo 4 dipped lower in populations than halo 3 6 months after release. Sure reach was pretty bad mlg dropped it after a few seasons. Halo 4 was so shit semis and pros I played with quit the game and went to cod or league. You are comparing a 4 year old game to a 2 year old game of course halo 4 has a higher population derp. But if we compare these uu numbers from time of release Reach wins by a landslide. Seriously I expect more from you but you are dipping to beurtard and mr e0s levels of retardation.
-
[quote]Holy -blam!- you cant argue with someone who is pants on head[/quote]Not sure why you put your pants on your head, but I will argue with you doing that and the following points. First argument with your pants point, try to stay on topic - trey very hard. [quote]The numbers actually do prove my point[/quote]I provided a link proving my point ... all you have is an unsupported opinion (and that being an opinion of someone who puts his pants on his head - sorry, you loose). [quote]By six months halo 4 had dropped[/quote]Trust you are comparing the same measure, if only we had something more than you opinion to tell. The UU count measures the number of individual gamers in a given week rather than a few desperados playing dozens of games 24/7. [quote]pros I played with quit the game[/quote]So another opinion ... bit short on some supported facts :( [quote]But if we compare these uu numbers from time of release Reach[/quote]lol ... and by this point those pant of your must have been firmly over your eyes. Honestly ... go check my post ... two links showing these UU counts you bullshit about, however the truth show lolReach failing after just 2 weeks ... and failing to a game more than a year older than it. (just like your whole unsupported opinion)
-
Better bust out the tin foil hats, yo.
-
[quote]Better bust out the tin foil hats, yo.[/quote]Do they work? How many times have you used them in the past? ([i]best to humor the crazed - sounds like he has a large supply in reserve[/i])
-
I'm not the one coming up with dumb conspiracies.
-
[quote]dumb conspiracies[/quote] lol ... "[i]bust out the tin foil hats[/i]" Here in the real world that [b]WOULD[/b] count as the biggest of those dumb conspiracies. Or where you just trolling, posting stupid crap in the hope of getting a reaction ??
-
I'm trolling? No, that really is a retarded thing to think.
-
[quote]I'm trolling[/quote]At last ... a confession. Not that we needed one, after all the basic lack of supportive links, the inability to stay OT, the use of the (almost hidden) troll glyph in your forum name. But it is good for your soul to confess.
-
Nice to see that you changed my post to suit you.
-
[quote]changed my post[/quote]No changes ... just removed the noise. Nice to see [b]you[/b] still holding true to those [b]troll[/b] ideals.
-
If you want to believe I'm a troll, then by all means. It won't make you right though.
-
[quote]If you want to believe I'm a troll, then by all means.[/quote]Didn't know we needed your permission ... but thanks.
