JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Servicio de alertas
Hoy, Destiny 2 estará fuera de línea temporalmente para recibir mantenimiento programado. Haz clic aquí para ver el Reporte de actualizaciones y servidor de Destiny.

Varios

Navega una corriente de discusiones aleatorias.
Editado por dazarobbo: 12/11/2013 6:17:05 AM
61

A Logical argument for God's Existence (must read)

[b]Let me explain[/b] Without God there could be no science without science there could be no God. If there were no universe for science to know, there could be no science, right? Of course. And if there were no God to create the universe, there could be no universe. Therefore if there were no God, there could be no science. Now here is where some of you might say "I don't believe God created the universe, this guy is an idiot." Well then who created the universe then? I can say God was always here but you guys cant say the universe has always been here and here is the reason why. If you look at this universe you'll find good evidence for a God who made it. You might not see it because you are looking with your eyes and not with your mind. You need to start asking more questions. [b]Here is something to help you realize[/b] [b]Skeptic[/b]: How do you know that God exists? I don’t understand how you can believe in something that you can’t see. [b]Christian[/b]: Well, let me ask you a couple of questions. [b]Skeptic[/b]: Sure. [b]Christian[/b]: Can we agree that something exists [premise one]? [b]Skeptic[/b]: Yes. [b]Christian[/b]: Can we agree that nothing does not produce something [premise two]? [b]Skeptic[/b]: Let me think about that. [b]Christian[/b]: This should be easy to realize. Nothing can’t do anything. What is nothing? It is no-thing. It can’t eat, breathe, think, move, or act. Nothing is nothing. Even David Hume conceded that it is an absurd proposition to suggest that things arise without a cause. [b]Skeptic[/b]: That makes sense. Yes. [b]Christian[/b]: If something exists, and nothing does not produce something then can we agree that something must have always existed [premise three]? [b]Skeptic[/b]: Hunh? [b]Christian[/b]: Something must have always existed to have brought into being the things that now exist, for as you just agreed: Nothing cannot produce something. Now, there are only two options as to what that something that has always existed might be: The universe or something outside the universe. Well amazingly, today scientists have actually proven that the universe has not always existed [premise four]. The motion of the galaxies, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the Background Radiation Echo all point to the fact that the universe began to exist. If the universe has not always existed, and something must have always existed, then something or someone outside of the universe must have always existed, I propose to you that that person is an intelligent, living, powerful being, i.e. God [conclusion]. [b]Skeptic[/b]: Interesting. No one’s ever explained it to me that way. [b]CONCLUSION[/b] For me it is more reasonable to believe, based on the laws of logic as well as the observable scientific evidence that God exists, rather than to believe what the atheist believes that nothing, times nobody, equals everything we see in the universe. Throw in the fact that we also have the testimony of our conscience and the revelation of God in the Scriptures.

Publicando en idioma:

 

Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

Ver el resto del tema
No se te permite acceder a este contenido.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon