If you have ever complained about CoD being the same every game, or BF4 being BF 3.5, you are a hypocrite.
That is all.
English
#Gaming
-
2 RespuestasYeah those guys suck. What we need is Halo 1.5.
-
4 Respuestas100 replies in 6 hours, 55 minutes!
-
I'm still waiting for halo 2.5...
-
That straw man argument.
-
I never had anything wrong with a few games being the same due to basic gameplay. But CoD will continue through the same trend until it is no longer profitable .
-
Halo 3.5 > Halo 4 and Reach
-
10 RespuestasYou're bad at Halo 3, retarded and think the post 3 titles are true Halo games. We get it.
-
8 RespuestasHey buddy, next time you go accusing people of being hypocrites, don't make the assumption that everyone who didn't like Reach or 4 wants Halo 3.5.
-
6 RespuestasVery few people would want an HD remastering of Halo 3. Once you have already played a game improving the graphics does little to improve the replay value or else there would be tons of people playing Halo CEA, but there aren't. Then on top of that as much as people bitch about CoD and BF they do change from one installment to the next so calling people that complain about CoD/BF hypocrites really isn't true. If anything you would be better off saying people that enjoy Halo 2 and Halo 3, but insult CoD/BF are hypocrites since that kind of change is more in line with CoD/BF's change. If anything you are voicing your opinion about a minority to the majority which is pointless.
-
1 RespuestaITT: Conflicting opinions These threads are fun.
-
20 Respuestas[u]Dear anyone who wants Halo to stay like Halo 4.[/u] Go fuck yourselves.
-
1 Respuesta*Gasp* I inspired this.
-
1 RespuestaThe problem is that you're creating a black-and-white situation where all kinds of change are the same, and all kinds of sameness are the same. Change, or lack thereof, in CoD isn't the same as that of Halo because both what the change is affecting and how the change is affecting it are much different. Basically, you've tried to say that people who want (a lack of) change are doing so only for the sake of change-- the only situation in which your post would make sense.
-
17 RespuestasAnd if you want the next Halo to be anything like Halo 4 you're a -blam!-ing idiot so oh well right?
-
I can see how it doesn't even has to make sense to be addictive
-
7 RespuestasI love Halo 3, but I don't want Halo 3.5. In fact, I'd like a mix of Reach, 4, and 3, where there are two main playlists: Competitive, and Infinity. In Competitive, it's straight up 3, but with AA's on map, Sprint toggable, and Thruster as Elite toggable. On-Map weapons, etc. Infinity is just infinity.
-
1 Respuesta[i] [/i]
-
1 RespuestaShut up.
-
3 RespuestasI would have no problem with a halo 3.5 [spoiler]best game ever, that's why[/spoiler]
-
1 RespuestaI want halo 3.5. Your just a filthy casual who can't out br anyone.
-
12 RespuestasK so wanting halo to go back to its roots is a halo 3.5 kkk kid
-
1 RespuestaI think it's more along the lines of IMPROVING Halo 3. People here enjoyed it, so why not take the good and remove the bad? The CoD/BF games don't do that. They screw you over with the same thing every year (eg perks).
-
-
Editado por Hunter: 12/23/2013 2:35:11 PMI want a game more inline with Reach, or rather, a more traditional Halo experience. And no custom loadouts, no ordnance, no shitty rank based on playtime, etc.
-
1 Respuestaalso, cod the enemies are essentially all copies. you get more variety of battle style and can use different tactics in halo (though in terms of the situations they put you in, cod 4 is on par with halo 3)
-
maybe i'm not the type of people you're referring to, but (at least to me) when i says cod is repetitive, i mean the gameplay is repetitive. You kill each other so fast it just relies on luck alot. In halo, you actually duel someone and it takes reasonable time and skill.