Both restart player progression. Both disregard the time people invested into getting desired loot. Mark Noseworthy stated in the stream that they no longer want to develop D3 because people worked hard to earn gear in D2 like they did in D1. Well sunsetting contradicts this narrative. I still don't understand why it's happening. But enough is enough.
-
5 RespuestasHey funny guy, except you're forgetting that Destiny was originally supposed to carry all of your profession forward. Sunsetting is INFINITELY worse than a Destiny 3. A new engine? New everything, updated everything? Please, oh please give us that. Except, they aren't going to. Their passion for the game is dead. They want to finish things off with this game before moving on to the next Trainwreck.
-
Those are 2 very very very different things. Unless your only criteria is "can't use old gear" Which makes just as much sense as saying whales a spiders are the same animal because they both live on earth
-
It is different though. . . Much less effort goes into sunsetting gear.
-
3 RespuestasExcept it saves them the expense of creating an engine that's finally appropriate for supplementing and maintaining this shit show.
-
14 RespuestasEditado por Yosemite Sam: 6/25/2020 11:00:49 PM[quote] I still don't understand why it's happening.[/quote] It's in plain sight and it always has been. This company loves to wipe everything out and call that a fresh start. The problem with that, they always end up right back to where they left off leaving themselves going nowhere. What you should be asking is, how can a triple-A gaming company work on a game for 6 years, and constantly end up making the same mistake to never actually learn from any of their mistakes. That one is what you call mind-boggling.
-
1 RespuestaEditado por AUTOMATIK 2006: 6/26/2020 8:54:32 PMI would be 100% fine with sunsetting if it was Destiny 3. A whole new game built from the ground up to be better. Then I wouldn't feel bad about starting over cuz lets be real, Destiny 2 doesn't have "Next Gen" quality graphics. They are good, but "This Gen" level of good. If they put photo-realistic graphics, all new weapons, destinations ect. Then I would be down to start over. But not in this Destiny 2. I want to keep what took me so long to get if I'm gonna be playing in the same game with the same destinations.
-
Editado por Crota bin Oryx: 6/27/2020 5:44:43 PMThe only thing Bungie will be sunsetting is their playerbase. They can keep catering for the streamers, cheaters, hackers and exploiters (both in game and outside) and that will be the toxic wasteland future of this game. CBMM is their admittance to smaller playerbase so its happening
-
In destiny 3 we may have new gear Sun setting is making all our gear useless but letting us grind for the same gear again Lazy developers are behind this
-
4 RespuestasIt's for player incentive to play with new weapons They don't want to make a D3 because that would leave D2 contentless for a long period of time.
-
2 RespuestasEditado por Snez: 6/26/2020 3:23:29 PMIt's just as a means to remove the evidence of year 1 and to ease the game into a newer structure. We are also forgetting that these weapons can still be used you just can't in endgame content. I'd rather they clean up the dirt that was year 1 of the game and then if they do learn from what they've gotten wrong (unlike they usually do). I find that sunsetting is the cost of removing older content - which whilst it wasn't bad, it reminds people of a time where this game literally was one of the most disappointing with the potential it had. What comes to mind when the topic arises is how Bungie has never been the best with language but when it comes to taking action it all goes out the window. In other words whatever they say about sunsetting there is a high chance something will be wrong. It may be that the cap is 1060 next season but is bumped up slowly in correspondence with Beyond Lights season cap by season 13. We have to take what they say with a pinch of salt, as we are harassing the company about what they are doing is wrong or how poor you think the company is, the content isn't in front of us - we have no idea what it will be like; we also can't compare this game against others it is entirely different and is in the developers eyes an "Ever-evolving world" with PvEvP and PvP which I don't believe there are many of (correct me if I'm wrong). I'd say if we are going to complain about something we wait until we are certain of how it will work and how it works with the new environment in Beyond Light. (So wait until September before we start complaining and giving feedback as that is where if it does fail they will notice it and you can be as spiteful and shame the company all you want if you are really into that).
-
Oh shite. They don't have the money to make us do a reset the respectable way, so this is D3 on a budget. Ah. Bet. And the gag is, they are removing D2 content.
-
But sunsetting 2345332346433454 times cheaper for development
-
4 RespuestasNot really. You can still use sunsetted weapons in regular strikes and crucible
-
Honestly if it was just sunsetting for new and cool improved new weapons I would be like ok I can live with this, but they sunset weapons so you they can be released again and you have to get them AGAIN is unexcusable
-
Because now they won’t have to build a newer up to date game engine like they most certainly would if they did make D3. This Tiger engine is over a decade old. And takes entirely too long to edit(build) content. D3 would also need dedicated servers. Because p2P networking sucks and the community is proof of that. Clans made that record IP addresses just so they can constantly harass players. Because they get out much cheaper this way.
-
1 RespuestaIt’s like bungie is trying to slowly pretend that destiny 2 never happened.
-
It's just a way of making people grind for the shit they have already got. Without additional new content. All about the money.
-
eehhhh i think this is a bit misguided. D3 means: larger content droughts in D2 while they develop a new game, and eventually abandoning it like D1. Then when D3 launches it will again have way less content then its predecessors bc they started from scratch. All of our gear will be new, and anything at all that we earned or bought before would be gone. Sunsetting,we still keep everything cosmetic, we still keep all our exotics, and we still keep all our legendaries. We just have to use legendaries from the last 12 months when we want to try the endgame content. So it's a partial reset, to encourage players to chase new gear, and also a way for bungie to remove guns like recluse and moutaintop from the meta without constant nerfs.
-
Editado por Sarges24: 6/26/2020 10:49:40 PMI think they made the right decision in sticking to D2. We all remember what happened when Bungie tried to do a sequel. Yeah, Year 1 was an utter embarrassment Bungie should have never shipped. Far as I'm concerned they should have given us Forsaken for how bad D2 was through year 1. Not only that but the planets in D2 don't hold a candle to how well constructed the planets of D1 were. Sure they look better and have more floral but mechanically, game play wise D1 planets, imho were superior. Granted even D1 planets had room for improvement but they were great playgrounds. But yeah, I think sticking with D2 was a good move especially but not limited to if they can give PS5/XBX players a boost & decrease load times via a patch. However mapping the next 2 years out and sticking with D2 long term. I question that move but if nothing at least they're telling fans D2 will be milked, I mean supported through at least 2022. You'd think at some point they need to make D3 but financially, I'm not surprised they're sticking with D2. Creating and releasing a D3 means cross gen split and if they devote to PS5/XBX the sales can't make up the cost in, at the very least, 2020-2021. However, sun-setting is a MAJOR mistake. Personally it's very likely the last straw for me. I almost deleted D2 the other night but since I paid for the season passes in the deluxe edition last year.... And who knows, maybe I suck it up but here's hoping PS5 and other games can fill the void and allow me to just forget about D2. It's not hard once you've stepped away and as much as I love Destiny I just can't keep doing this. Artificial grinds up the wazoo, sun-setting, Rampage and Kill Clip getting nerfed twice in less than a year along with the ridiculously slow reload times..... What's funny is the whole vaulting thing I could probably get over and live with. Though even that, I've paid $60 for D2, $X for Year 1 DLCs, $60 for Forsaken + $X for DLCs and last year another $60 for Shadowkeep + Season Passes. The same bundle they now want $70 for this Fall. It's a bit disturbing but not nearly as much so as sun setting. Not to mention all the $ I spent on D1 and it's DLCs and Fall Expansions. Or the $5 I paid just two months for the Austringer ornament which is a weapon I absolutely love that will no longer be usable in end game activities until when/if Bungie decides to re-release it and make me re-grind a roll I like or a god roll. There's no Menagerie so it won't be as easy as slotting runes and hoping for the best....
-
1 Respuesta*Slaps Destiny 2* "This baby can fit so much Destiny 1 in it"
-
8 RespuestasDestiny 3 would have been a huge opportunity to renew interest in the franchise by launching with a new engine on a next gen console, a fresh story, new characters, and correct everything wrong with the current game engine (like the power leveling scheme that no one seems to like). I think a reset to player progression under these circumstances would have been welcomed by most. It's been 3 years, the franchise is due for a major reboot. Instead they're clinging to this "drip feed" seasonal model on a hampered engine that seems largely unchanged from Destiny 1. It's a big let down.
-
There’s a lot of blind Destiny followers arguing in favor of weapon sunsetting. I’ve been around for a long time now. I can tell you 100% certainty that every weapon being taken away will be recycled in some future content. Bungie recycles 90% of its content.
-
No. D3 would have been a chance to move on from the turgid waste of code that is D2. Instead, we have 6 years of the lacklustre garbage that is D2, a game that even after 3 years, is nowhere near approaching the level of fun and excitement that D1 provided, despite Bungo's 'best' efforts (which amount to little) to turn the rotten piece of roadkill that is D2 into D1. Joke dev.
-
1 Respuestadisagree. they are making it pre set rolls. and no new pinnacles. all weapons will be vanilla. just like all new ones they introduced since pinnacles stopped. no random rolls. less stability.
-
1 RespuestaEditado por OdinsKnight101: 6/26/2020 1:07:43 PMThey simply feel they have not earned the right to make a D3. Besides if they did Splitting the playerbase like that when we're on the verge of a new console generation, would have been a horrible mistake.
-
U S E N E W G E A R Applies primarily to pve, but it's been a thing since forever in Destiny. Are we really going to use recluse and mountaintop for the next 2 years and ignore the new stuff? We legit need to get over this