And by what logic is it Bungies fault that [i]"only 15% of amount played the event"[/i]? [i]"Hey guys, new content here"[/i] and suddenly 85% players yeeted off the game and started playing Anthem? And last I saw, Hunters actually have won during Guardian Games, so it was feasible. Reading the TWAB, it's very clear that Hunters had enough bodies participating in event and won the first day. But for reason or another haven't done so since then. [quote][i]On Day 1 of the event, Hunters won not simply because there are more of them, but because a greater percentage of them showed up and contributed. We don’t plan on making any changes that will affect the results in any way. Our goal has always been to create a competition that is decided by how much each class engages with the event, and not which class has the largest roster. Titans are currently engaging the most, but we will see if they keep it up.[/i][/quote] Do you have some source confirming each classes medal value? All I'm seeing that all three classes have had their medal worth balanced.

Bungie clearly said that titan and warlock medals were worth the same while only hunters got adjusted. And the problem with only 15% of players playing the event is because bungie counted total amount of players. Not people who played at the moment.

[quote][i]Bungie clearly said that titan and warlock medals were worth the same while only hunters got adjusted.[/i][/quote] This is the part of where I was asking for source. In TWAB I can see that they were adjusted to be worth than Hunters, but how much is the difference between Titan and Warlock? Them saying [i]"worth more"[/i] isn't informative enough when Titan could be 1.3x and Warlock 1.5x - in both cases they are [i]"worth more than Hunter"[/i]. [quote][i]And the problem with only 15% of players playing the event is because bungie counted total amount of players.[/i][/quote] And where is this from? In the TWAB I'm seeing that they analyzed the player activity and used potential player numbers based on player data.