[quote]If you're talking bout the 20-round magazine variant.....not much. If you're talking about the FIVE-round magazine variant.....quite a lot really. Since the person using the five-round variant will need to RELOAD three times before he can put 20 rounds down range and into a crowd of people in a mass public shooting. Giving more people a chance to escape and avoid injury. [/quote] Not talking about magazine size. And idk what you're on about "variants" when multiple aftermarket magazines, of multiple round combinations, is available [quote]Calling something a "ranch rifle" doesn't change its fundamental nature. A rose by any other name...... :))[/quote] Thanks for exemplifying my point. Nearly the same and not a peep about banning them, only the scary black rifles

[quote]Not talking about magazine size.[/quote] I am. [quote]And idk what you're on about "variants" when multiple aftermarket magazines, of multiple round combinations, is available[/quote] ...and each differing combination is a "variant". Would you like a dictionary link? [quote]Thanks for exemplifying my point.[/quote] And thank you for exemplifying mine. You never approach this discussion in good faith...and always try to muddy the waters by trying to confuse people with a disingenuous effort to lose them in terminology. Unfortunately for you...you can't do that to me. [quote]Nearly the same and not a peep about banning them, only the scary black rifles[/quote] Because those of us who do know what we're talking about understand that the issue is the design....and the magazine capacity. Which is why I have no problems with you being sold the 5 round mag. That's more than adequate for any reasonable civilian use. The 20-round mag is more than you need for any legitimate civilian use without having to reload. Now. Want to talk bump stocks??

[quote]I am. [/quote] And have fun discussing that with yourself... [quote]...and each differing combination is a "variant". Would you like a dictionary link?[/quote] I collect guns as a hobby. Multiple gun reference books as well as the catalogs themselves say you're wrong. So say what you want....bottom line, you're wrong [quote] And thank you for exemplifying mine. You never approach this discussion in good faith...and always try to muddy the waters by trying to confuse people with a disingenuous effort to lose them in terminology.[/quote] I.e I expect others to know what they're talking about....my bad lol [quote]Unfortunately for you...you can't do that to me. [/quote] No, I just prove you wrong and laugh while doing it. [quote]Because those of us who do know what we're talking about understand that the issue is the design....and the magazine capacity. Which is why I have no problems with you being sold the 5 round mag. That's more than adequate for any reasonable civilian use. The 20-round mag is more than you need for any legitimate civilian use without having to reload. Now. Want to talk bump stocks??[/quote] And here is where I stop wasting my time....

Lol you didn’t provide a single counter point in the entire post.

Do you not see the top where I state "have fun discussing that with yourself (magazine size)" Then he goes on to talk about magazine size..... You read my response but, apparently, too hard to comprehend

[quote]I collect guns as a hobby. Multiple gun reference books as well as the catalogs themselves say you're wrong. So say what you want....bottom line, you’re wrong.[/quote] HAHAHAHAHA This isn’t proving someone wrong. This is totally baseless. You’re just saying that they’re wrong because you think you’re right. Lol.

Did you know the Winchester model 52 came with a single shot, and a 5 shot magazine? Both with the same serialized numbered model 52. Did you know you could get a different variation of the model 52 that came with a stainless steel barrel? (Only made few years in the late 20's- early 30's and I have one) Nope. You, nor him, knew this and yet you still want to argue.....lol

Lol are you autistic or something? Forget your meds? Go check your pill box and refill it.