{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/20/2018 11:45:14 AM
24
Lock Her Up, Lock Her Up!
How could this woman be so stupid as to use a private e-mail account to discuss White House official business, potentially compromising national security - it's inconceivable!
It's not like her father spent most of his campaign complaining about exactly the same thing about his political opponent!
[url]https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46271021[/url]
English
#Offtopic
-
[spoiler][quote][i]Hillary Clinton[/i][/quote][/spoiler]
-
If this was a sitcom the audience wouldn't believe these characters.
-
9 RespuestasNothing she sent was classified.... What the problem is?
-
6 RespuestasI guarantee there will be an excuse as why this is different. Supporters never hold POTUS, or his family, accountable for anything that they do. It's a totally hypocritical double standard.
-
3 RespuestasEditado por apnp_apnu: 11/22/2018 5:58:39 PMI agree it is stupid , however nothing classified , unlike her fathers political opponent . (Which btw she got of the hook with zero repercussions) . And the president did not “claim he knew nothing about it “ even though there were emails showing that former president Obama knew that she had . It’s not the same thing no matter how you slice it . However she should be forced to go to meetings to reinforce any and all training she has had regarding matters of national security. And deserves the flak she gets for doing something so unquestionable irresponsible.
-
5 Respuestas[quote]How could this woman be so stupid as to use a private e-mail account to discuss White House official business, potentially compromising national security - it's inconceivable! It's not like her father spent most of his campaign complaining about exactly the same thing about his political opponent! [url]https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46271021[/url][/quote] She didnt send or receive classified information. She didnt lie about it. And she didnt delete 30,000+ emails before turning things over to the proper officials. So, if we should "lock her up" for this, what should we do to Hillary?
-
[quote]How could this user be so stupid as to post something political to discuss opinionated political shit, potentially compromising offtopics security - it's inconceivable! [/quote]
-
2 RespuestasIf it’s true, then she should be punished, no one’s exempt from the law
-
Editado por Number1 Casual: 11/23/2018 6:38:57 PMI hope Ivanka enjoys years worth of investigations! Ha! P.S. To all the Trumpers saying she didn’t forward classified info, how do you know? We will find out soon enough in 2019!
-
[quote]inconceivable![/quote]
-
13 RespuestasHer and Hillary both should face consequences. Regardless of all the “but Hillary deleted things” nerds.
-
This is why we can't have nice things
-
6 RespuestasIf its proven true, I think she should get the same consequences as the last person who did this. Lunch with her FBI director best friends, and a run at president.
-
6 RespuestasShameless bump
-
4 RespuestasMan the usual suspects always get real quiet when you catch their side being hypocrites
-
let me see the violations, then i will agree to prosecute
-
5 Respuestas[quote]On Monday, [u]the Washington Post[/u] reported that while [b]Ms Trump's emails contained mostly logistical and personal information[/b], some [b]may[/b] still have been in violation of federal records rules.[/quote] So until they have irrefutable proof, it's just media allegations. [u]Highly classified email sent via Ivanka's personal email to another unnamed head of state that was NOT ON WHITE HOUSE AUTHORIZED CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL - OMG!!!!!!!!!!!![/u] "Hey ____, I'm just wondering if you were still planning on coming to our house for coffee tomorrow. Let me know. Ivanka"
-
2 RespuestasBut did she use a VPN is the better question
-
Editado por Partisan: 11/20/2018 10:04:14 PMBroke: investigating the professional corruption of various members of the Trump family, as it pertains to their conflicts of interest with government work Woke: buttery males [spoiler]Joke: using a dead meme format[/spoiler]
-
2 RespuestasThere's really no comparison between this and what Hillary did. At the end of the story it even says "it is not illegal for White House officials to use personal email accounts for government business". Now, if she had her own server set up, was sending out classified info, and conveniently deleted a bunch right after they were requested, then I'd say get after her.
-
2 RespuestasToo many questions. When she was notified she shouldn't be using personal emails she stopped. If she deleted important documents then yes, she should be prosecuted for that. Just as Hillary should be prosecuted for deleting government documents. She's an attorney. She had to know that's illegal.
-
1 RespuestaThe entire trump family is a load that should have been swallowed.
-
1 RespuestaEditado por PumaCheyenne: 11/20/2018 8:43:26 PM
-
[quote]Ms Trump did not create a private server and never transmitted any classified information. "The account was never transferred or housed at Trump Organization, no emails were ever deleted, and the emails have been retained in the official account in conformity with records preservation laws and rules."[/quote] >>Hillary drilling holes and pouring bleach on private server HDD's<< or >>Ivanka looking good having a blonde moment<<
