{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/4/2017 10:23:10 PM
38
Supreme court upholds travel ban: eat it liberals
It's nice to see common sense prevail despite radical alt left antics.
https://www.apnews.com/b8244def36484dfb93fd958962b7d649/Supreme-Court-allows-full-enforcement-of-Trump-travel-ban
English
#Offtopic
-
I can't afford to travel anywhere anyways.
-
2 RespuestasI'll never understand celebration of others misery.
-
35 RespuestasThe travel ban sends an extremely loud message. “We’re scared”
-
86 RespuestasEditado por Dinklebrat: 12/5/2017 5:01:18 AMThe first amendment of the constitution: [quote]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof*[/quote] *Unless that religion Islam right? It amazes me how quick conservatives are to defend religious freedom when it’s Christianity but so quick to suppress religious freedom when it’s Islam. And please don’t try and give me some BS about it’s not being a ban on Muslims but a ban on people from certain countries. Trumps himself has repeatedly called it a “Muslim ban”. For example: [quote]calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.[/quote]
-
10 RespuestasIf you actually paid attention to what happened, the court only stated that they would continue the ban while the court determines if it is constitutional or not. They didn't rule it as anything yet. Just that since the president issued it, we should uphold it until it is found to be unconstitutional (which it will be).
-
1 Respuestaok trump DID win, but it isn't really a win here's why -
-
All of you're replies are pretty much "suck it libruls XD" without any actual discussion. You're not really helping your case, here.
-
3 Respuestas"Hur dur muslum bann"
-
[quote]It's nice to see common sense prevail despite radical alt left antics. https://www.apnews.com/b8244def36484dfb93fd958962b7d649/Supreme-Court-allows-full-enforcement-of-Trump-travel-ban[/quote] Ah, again the unilateral court [in which no appeal may be made above] decision interpreting the very document said to keep this very entity limited in power.
-
10 RespuestasEditado por Morty Cohenstein: 12/5/2017 12:20:05 AMAmerica and Poland are the only countries coming to their senses right now. I hope mine wakes up soon
-
I don't let the courts dictate what is and isn't legitimate in my eyes. Remember, this court system also put its stamp on the ACA. Do you look upon that with similar pride?
-
LETS DEPORT THE COMMIES [quote]wrong thread?[/quote]
-
In what world should this be considered a moral victory for conservatives? Such a status implies that its value lies in the political points it earns, rather than the actual effects of it.
-
4 RespuestasEditado por tjustie: 12/5/2017 4:45:02 AMFor those who are out of the loop, nothing was upheld. The Supreme Court just put a stay on the preliminary injunction filed against the travel ban. This does not make any statement on the legality or constitutionality of the ban, but it does let it go into effect while the lower courts continue to work on it, and the ban will probably make it's way to the Supreme Court eventually anyways. It [i]is[/i] possible that the Supreme Court thinks there's a reasonable chance that the travel ban will be found to be legal however, as "a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits" is [url=https://law.freeadvice.com/litigation/legal_remedies/refuse-injunction-relief.htm]one of the elements[/url] that might factor into obtaining injunctive relief, but the white house had been heavily pressing the "irreparable harm" element too, which may have actually been the reason for the stay. So while this might be suggestive of a future win for the Trump admin, we really can't say for sure because the Supreme Court didn't actually say anything of note in [url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/120417zr1_j4ek.pdf]the orders[/url].
-
1 RespuestaHAHAHA LIBTARDS RESIGNED 🇺🇸#MAGA🇺🇸 🤠#LOVEMACOUSIN🤠
-
you mean "eat it, immigrants and refugees"?
-
It's a start. Now white people need to start popping out those kids again, experts say.
-
5 RespuestasAmerica needs to shut down all immigration. You're gonna become the next China when it comes to population if you don't
-
He scared.
-
5 RespuestasWell, I said from the very beginning that I didnt think wanting to vet immigration processes was such a bad thing. I just thought Trump worded it as badly as humanly possible if thats what he truly wanted.
-
8 Respuestas*yet Saudi Arabia is still not on the list...
-
2 RespuestasIt literally changes nothing in our lives.
-
4 RespuestasEditado por SGT Bronson: 12/5/2017 2:32:18 AMTime to ban all the countries where terrorists have never been documented from coming from. "Buh buh obummer banned those countries first." That doesn't make it any less asinine. Plus, I was under the impression Trump was different from other politicians. Maybe they'll just go to Mexico so they can flood across the border like some of you lunatics think actually happens.
-
4 Respuestaslol i remember some neet arguing with me on here that the supreme court would never let a travel ban happen. the past 2 years have been really amazing, watching people act like they know what theyre talking about and getting rekt by reality
-
Interesting. Alt left is a new term for me. Far left? That’s a thing. Alt left? Not sure about that. Also, did you read the article you linked?
-
10 RespuestasWould you call it radical left? Radical religion is blowing people up or defending pedophiles, radical right is running people over in cars, radical skateboarding is doing wizard flips bro. I think going through the court system isn't as radical as that and if that's all they need to be radical it's a compliment for them I guess.
