{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/13/2017 12:45:14 AM
1
Just because you said I would deny it does not make your point true.
I can put forth any dumb opinion and say that you will outright deny it therefore my argument is true.
It does not make any sense.
I have, in detail, pointed out why your arguments are pointless. They are filled with nothing but subjective opinions, assumptions and conjecture.
If you want to come up with a convincing argument you need to produce facts and then objectively show us how those facts relate to your conclusion.
I implore you to give it a try, though I am starting to doubt if you even can. And please stop with the Ad Hominems.
English
-
This is really bad bait, because you're literally just repeating my argument in a reverse context.
-
At this point the irony of you criticizing my English capabilities becomes all too funny. I don't even know if you understand what you are typing anymore. I haven't actually put forth an opinion that counters yours directly. I have pointed out flaws in your arguments. First it was that you compared free content to content behind a paywall. Then it was that your argument was based on conspiracy theories without any basis in evidence. When pressed about said lack of evidence you try to flip it around on me? Do you understand the burden of proof?
-
Yes, I do understand the burden of proof, how much it takes to gather such evidence and proof, and what it takes to gather it into a concise and effective argument. Apparently, however, it is not coming to fruition in this argument, as you refuse to listen, so I'll just stop now. It's been four days of this anyway.
