[quote]California Attorney General Xavier Becerra (D) will bar state employees from business trips to four states after those states passed measures limiting the rights of LGBT people.
The new restrictions prohibit state-funded or state-sponsored travel to Texas, Alabama, Kentucky and South Dakota, Becerra said Thursday.
State legislators in Texas, Alabama and South Dakota this year passed new laws allowing adoption or foster parent agencies to refuse service to LGBT families. A new Kentucky law would allow student organizations at state schools to block LBGT people from membership.
California’s Democrat-dominated legislature passed a measure last year barring state-funded travel to states that allow discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Already, the law has blocked employee travel to four other states — Kansas, Mississippi, North Carolina and Tennessee.
“While the California [Department of Justice] works to protect the rights of all our people, discriminatory laws in any part of our country send all of us several steps back,” Becerra said in a statement. “That’s why when California said we would not tolerate discrimination against LGBTQ members of our community, we meant it.”
The California law still allows some employees to travel to states on the banned list, for special exempted purposes like collecting tax revenue, engaging in litigation or to complete on-the-job training. It also allows employees who must appear in a banned state to participate in meetings or training to obtain grant funding.
Becerra, appointed to fill the vacancy left behind when Sen. Kamala Harris (D) quit the attorney general’s office in January, is seeking election in 2018. He faces state Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones (D), the only other announced candidate.[/quote]
Good. I'm glad my tax dollars won't be used to subsidize trips to states that support discrimination.
-
6 RespuestasThat's division. This is the beginning of true division among states. Cutting off vacations simply because they don't have the same laws is stupid. I thought this was a country that allowed free travel. Guess Cali doesn't want to follow the rules anyway. They'd rather the US be a totalitarian society than a free democracy anyway
-
5 RespuestasThe only time I have a problem with the LGBTQ is when they try to force a church to hold a wedding for them, but as I've seen so far, that's rare. It's wrong to force people against their convictions.
-
3 RespuestasAhh, virtue signaling at it's pettiest.
-
3 RespuestasNot for discrimination but also not for praising of mental disorder instead of trying to get them help. (Referring to the T not the LGB)
-
Several things I've noted: One: The majority of people in this thread does not understand the difference between state officials traveling and ordinary citizens traveling. Two: Unlike the states listed in the ban for discrimination against LGBT, I can hold my tongue when around LGBT people. Even though I show no support for LGBT people, they have the right to have their own opinions , and I respect that right.
-
Pretty interesting. I wonder, however, what things are banned, exactly, for state funded travel. It says things like training and such are still allowed but it doesn't state what's explicitly banned. Unless I missed something...
-
7 RespuestasHell yeah! Texas actually has a brain!
-
1 RespuestaWhen an extremely liberal state can successfully implement a travel ban better than the president.
-
78 RespuestasAre you kidding me? This is stupid, states have the right to decide certain things. And also LGBT people have the same rights as everyone else, but they complain because they don't have EXTRA rights.
-
2 RespuestasI don't get it. You people fully support a travel ban that stops people who discriminate against LGBT, but when one comes up that stops travel from places that [b]kill[/b] LGBT, you freak out
-
Wow what a bunch of babies. Things like this are why Hillary lost, everyone outside the far left bubble just looks at them as ridiculous clowns who are making jokes in which they are the punchline.
-
1 RespuestaAbortions, attacking free speech at state schools and continuing to fund outrageous pensions 👍. Use the correct bathroom 👎
-
22 RespuestasWhat's the law? What I've heard is a ruling recently about religious freedom. Tell me, how is an LGBT person's rights infringed by not being able to join an organization or adopt from an organization that explicitly opposes their way of life? There are plenty of pro-LGBT groups to join and plenty of secular adoption agencies. How is the inverse less of a tragedy for liberalism? Do you believe groups that oppose the LGBT movement have no right to exist or hold their personal views? Do you believe religious organizations, who've maintained these opinions for millennia, have no right to hold them? Is homosexuality objectively good or evil? No. So, why is there no room available for conflicting opinions? Someone disliking my choices is not unfair discrimination. It is discrimination in the literal sense. Enumerating differences. Man and man or Woman and woman is not man and woman. A homosexual union IS different than a heterosexual union. They are not the same thing. We can have opinions on the legitimacy and impact of both. We should not be compelled to have the same opinion of both while imaging the incredibly evident differences do not exist(incredibly evident, they have different goddamn names denoting different goddamn things.) If a religious person believes homosexuality is a sin then their actions will reflect this. You seem to believe their actions should not reflect their beliefs which essentially means they have no right to their beliefs. I just don't see the issue here. No one is owed respect. No one is owed service. There is absolutely no basis for me to demand you like me and serve me regardless of who I am and what I do. People want freedom without consequences and that's a very dangerous principle to advocate.
-
I'm starting to think they should take the U out if USA
-
HEUR DEUR TEW MANY BEEG WURDS I JUS SEWPORT EQWAWLITAY
-
Good for California. - Der
-
Haven't seen a post about the supreme court decision RE travel ban...
-
Well this is stupid
-
Clickbait title
-
Editado por OlDirtySpecter: 6/26/2017 7:10:31 PMSo just hypothetically speaking what happens if UCLA has a game with a team from Texas or decides to schedule a game against Alabama?
-
So what if another state did this to any state that promoted the female only WW screenings? I for one would be glad my tax dollars wouldn't go toward trips to those disgustingly sexist states
-
13 RespuestasEditado por logan678910 65: 6/25/2017 8:50:48 AM*arriving at airport in Cali* "Excuse me, I need to get on this plane to Texas to visit my family." "Sorry sir, no can do. They don't bake cakes for gay people down there." "But I haven't seen them in a year!" "At least you're not going to a state that doesn't let gay people have wedding cakes." This is asinine and only makes life more annoying for everyone else, probably even gay people.
-
1 RespuestaWhile I agree they have every right to do this and don't care they're taking these measures can California just go away for like 5 to 50 years?
-
Check out @martyduren's Tweet: https://twitter.com/martyduren/status/878698809118916608?s=09 I like Tennessee now
-
In other news there's a flavor ban about to happen in San Fran. Informed parties [i]should[/i] know what I'm talking about. Good time to flood your local politicians inboxes folks. [spoiler]I'd apologize for trying to Jack your thread but you always make it to trending. Thx bby [/spoiler]
-
24 Respuestas>States discriminate against LGBTs "That's our right to discriminate against others!" >CA says they won't pay for employees to go to those states "HOW DARE YOU DISCRIMINATE AGAINST US!!" lol.