{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/1/2017 8:06:39 AM
17
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaa.........
You don't actually know what the word "proof" means, do you?
English
-
A term denoting the percentage of alcohol present in a beverage?
-
Care to guess what proof OP has been indulging in?
-
Sure do.
-
Editado por Dog_Of_War_1138: 6/1/2017 2:10:37 PMProve it. Explain how the existence of a DLC release schedule is "proof" that Destiny 2 has been completed and then "cut up" to form such content, as opposed to the more likely scenario that the DLC releases are simply being written as we speak, alongside the base release of D2. Occam's Razor: it's much simpler to write the game and then write the DLC, versus writing the game and then cutting it apart as if removing pages from a book. Even knowing next to nothing about programming, I know this.
-
Proof lol the proof is this year they where smart not to have a game play trailer. And if your taken the word of liars then even with it being in your face you would not believe it!
-
I'll bet you also don't know what the phrase [i]non sequitor[/i] means, but you just pulled off a perfect one. GR8 B8 M8
-
And it's also true.
-
Your repeated assertions, without evidence, do not constitute proof. "No gameplay trailer"- so what? They had a 1 and 1/2 hour gameplay live reveal. You're trying to state that a common business practice, the release of pre-planned DLC packs, means that those DLC packs could come from no other source than cut content. The burden of proof is on you to show that it's impossible for two teams of programmers, working simultaneously, to produce both a game and DLC without resorting to the mythical "cut content". You haven't met your burden of proof. You haven't approached it. Come up with some evidence and maybe we'll talk more.
-
I have already gave proof. Its your problem that your blind to it.
-
This is the same approach that people who "prove" the existence of God use. No actual evidence, just repeat over and over that they've already shown all they need to and the critics are blind.... Very revealing. You have a religious conviction that Bungie are out to screw you, on the basis of zero evidence whatsoever. Huh.
-
Editado por love god: 6/2/2017 1:28:39 PM...show me proof that they are not. I have the first game so go off of but i have no evidence...lol
-
Again, showing that you have no understanding of what "proof" is. Prosecutors are required to prove their allegations. Defendants aren't required to prove that they did NOT commit a crime. You're essentially accusing Bungie of doing something, so you have to provide evidence if you want to convince anyone. I don't have to show anything to exonerate them (even though there's plenty of common sense evidence that says you're wrong). For that matter, there was no "cut content" in Destiny 1, in the sense you think it was. The DLCs used [i]some [/i]existing material from the original, unfinished story which was rewritten and became the vanilla Destiny- this is true. But the key is "unfinished story". Destiny was NEVER completed and then taken apart again, like chapters cut out of a book, the way you seem to imagine it was. BUT Bungie did use already existing material, rather than rewrite the entire thing from scratch. Some went into the vanilla disk, a little went into DLC. But the DLC was heavily rewritten, as was the base game, so it bore virtually no resemblance to the first version of the story. Whether that's good or bad, we'll never know, because that story has never been told.
-
You think i care about that you say when one of my proofs is destiny its self. Lol [spoiler]did not even bother it read the post[/spoiler]
-
By your standards, you think you have proof. By the objective world, you have no proof. I've lost too many brain cells trying to think down at your level and make you understand, so, goodbye.
-
Lol no one ask you to post. And your words are not the law of me. So yes walk away because your wrong.
-
Also, turn on your autocorrect, you're embarrassing yourself with your repeated spelling and grammatical errors. Your repeated assertions of "your wrong" don't add anything to your argument, especially when they are not only misspelled, but in fact, you're wrong.
-
I thought u where leaving? Lol I guss i was rwong!
