Liberals: "Never trust Russia, they're lying fascists. We should also get involved in Syria."
*Trump launches 59 tomahawk missiles, almost all are effective and hit their targets*
Russia: "Only half reached the air base."
Liberals "Is Trump crazy? Why's he getting involved in Syria? He's gonna start WW3. Also, Assad didn't use chemical weapons and only half the missiles reached the air base. Just ask Russia, they can be trusted."
Meanwhile...
Trump: "I will obliterate ISIS"
*Trump drops the MOAB on an ISIS tunneling system, which sucks air, creates a huge impact and leaves a massive crater*
Liberals: The MOAB did nothing. Also, this didn't help the fight against ISIS at all.
Right, of course liberals, we should just nice ISIS into stopping their genocide. Liberals claim they want to help refugees, that they want to help Americans, and of course, illegal immigrants AKA criminals. They protested Trump's "Muslim ban", yet stayed quiet when Assad used chemical weapons against the people they claim to be supporting. In fact, the video I linked above is a refugee praising Trump.
Liberals, your game is over. Quit the blind criticism and accept the truth - Trump is effective, strong, and ready to fulfill America's destiny; [Redacted to prevent drowning in liberal tears]
-
Editado por CommisarScar: 4/20/2017 1:35:59 PMRule the world? Then you insert some liberal tears joke? I'm pretty sure many people, left or right, don't see how that would ever be a good thing. We aren't some imperialist nation trying to assume world dominance. We may be one of the most powerful nations in the world, but what right does that give us? [spoiler]I apologize if that's not what you quite meant, but you didn't elaborate.[/spoiler]
-
2 RespuestasI feel like "ruling the world" is a bad way to get people to like your nation
-
1 RespuestaIf there's one thing I'm willing to admit I know nothing about it's current military operations. Honestly none of us know anything. We've clearly been manipulated as a people countless times in the past by government agencies like the army and the CIA. No one knows what we destroyed, no one knows how many innocents we killed, no one knows who or what the targets actually might have been, etc Anything you think is a 'fact' could be a complete fabrication to hide our real agenda or to cover our tracks on a failure.
-
2 RespuestasInb4liberals
-
1 RespuestaI really think both sides switched their standpoints after the elections. Conservatives wanted to focus on America and liberals wanted to get involved, but now liberals want to focus on America and conservatives want to get involved. I think both sides are a wee bit biased.
-
Ahhh but OP you forget that liberals think that illegals are Americans
-
1 RespuestaStick to playing the kazoo. Pls no political posts.
-
3 RespuestasThey were ineffective. Didn't solve anything.
-
12 RespuestasThe last part makes trump sound like Hitler. And as a conservative I think that is wrong. Mainly because Hitlary is well... the name speaks for itself.
-
11 RespuestasEditado por Barbatos: 4/14/2017 5:50:59 PM>Airfield back up and running the next day >No evidence that Assad was behind the chemical weapon attack >Trump warned Russia, Syria's ally, in advance of the strike >The strike further hurt U.S.-Russia relations. The strike accomplished nothing and was grandstanding at best. Trump's reason for it was pure bullshit. Use of the MOAB was overkill but it was awesome.
-
4 Respuestas
-
2 RespuestasThis is more than liberals. A good third of his support base is saying the same.
-
But his own supporters are even saying he shouldn't have intervened with Syria. Also getting involved in syria doesn't always mean dropping bombs on them. There are a lot of other ways to help
-
5 RespuestasTrump is a joke, his supporters are the punchline.
-
2 Respuestas[quote]and of course, illegal immigrants AKA criminals.[/quote] All of them? [spoiler]What's the point of this post, nobody's going to change their opinion because of some stupid internet post.[/spoiler]
-
18 RespuestasHillary Clinton would have earned woman of the year, if she did the exact same thing. But god forbid Trump trying to take action against terrorists. But whatever, whatever helps them sleep at night, I suppose. Remember, it's better to take the fight to them, then vice versa and risk your own civilians getting killed in the process. [spoiler][b][i][u]KUPO!!![/u][/i][/b][/spoiler]
-
I like this
-
6 RespuestasLiberals: Hold their views with no base setting, and will alter what they say situation to situation Conservatives: Hold their views with too much of a setting, unwilling to alter them under any circumstance. Both have a tendency to be rather contradictory.
-
It is just another failed attempt. Liberals love losing all the time.
-
19 RespuestasSay what you will but financially, a MOAB is overkill. I support taking action on ISIS but not wasting such an expensive weapon on poorly armed terrorists. $16,000,000 to kill a handful, when it could have been saved for a real war where it could have been necessary.
-
4 RespuestasBecause apparently CNN is real news now that speaks for all liberals. . .
-
>implying both parties aren't adapting to the change in power dynamics to facilitate the government doing what it would normally do. >implying majority parties aren't inherently hypocritical and don't change at a moment's notice to do whatever they want.
-
4 RespuestasTomahawks don't just simply miss their target. As for the attack on Syria, as a slightly left leaning individual myself, I am indifferent to it. I really don't care. Despite that Trump was practically demanding Obama and (if) Hillary to not attack Syria and then proceeded to go against it, I believe that the attack was effective in that it showed that America isn't afraid. Plus the UN had our back on it. Stop blaming Liberals for -blam!-ing everything.
-
Go step on a lego.
-
3 RespuestasLmao. Nice, where did you get this from? Facebook
-
Glad to see nothing has changed since New Year's Day