doesn't believe in scientific fact (global warming)

I just think his choice of the head of the education department was a stupid choice. Other than that, I have not actually looked too much into what he has done. Aye but at least he gave Black History Month a more "professional" name

he appointed Ajit Pai as head of the FCC. The man wants to end net neutrality, which is a series of rules and laws that protect consumers from big tech/internet corporations abusing the system since they have all the money to lobby and they have billions to lobby with which they do use in shady ways. the big ISPS have been caught paying off state and federal representatives' campaigns in the 10s of thousands to have them sign a ghostwritten ISP letter against net neutrality in their jusrisdiction. net neutrality helps end-user consumers and small corporations by providing cheaper, faster fiber-optic internet and breaking up internet monopolies from the big guys who are charging a ton for a shitty connection through copper wires laid in the 1930s. since the 1990s, billions in government subsidies have been taken annually by the big players to lay out a national high-speed fiber optic network yet they have failed to do so and gotten away with it. the big guys have lobbied to legalize their monopolies and block competition through multi-decade contracts in a ton of places. that is anti-capitalist/ anti-consumer and very pro-facist/pro-oligarchy.

Well mostly I think he's unqualified which is fine to an extent but he's far too impulsive and so far has no fleshed out plan for what he's doing but talks out his ass about how he's making America great again. His trade policy is honestly a joke. Anyone who thinks more managed, protectionism, nationalist, whatever you want to call it policy is beneficial for American consumers and workers is just ignorant. Yes jobs are lost to trade, but many new jobs are created along with lower consumer prices. It's obvious if you look at historical data and see no correlation between unemployment and trade agreements, larger trade deficit, etc. Iirc you actually often see unemployment drop as free trade increases (as measured by the trade openness index). If you go back to Regan era for example and look at his steel quotas they saved about 9,000 American jobs but burdened the consumers about $750,000 per job saved. Doesn't seem very efficient especially because evidence shows new jobs would have been created any way to offset any job loss. He claims the Chinese are 'currency manipulators' but I'd be willing to bet he couldn't define it. Not only because he lacks any economic knowledge but because it's pretty much a made up word we use to attack other countries we don't like. First of all couldn't China argue that the us are currency manipulators too by targeting the fed funds rate? Ya literally you could call anything currency manipulation. Then we can go even further and look at nominal exchange rates (those effected by currency manipulation) in the past decade the dollar has dropped in value compared to the yuan yet our trade deficit with China has continued to increase at a more rapid rate. Then he wants to cut taxes dramatically to the point where he basically needs to cut half of government programs in order to keep the budget from going completely off the rails. Typically I'm all for tax cuts to stimulate the economy but the rate he's cutting them is absurd and the policies mostly favor the rich and corporations. All the while he wants to create jobs through government spending and waste tons of money on the god damn wall which consumers will be paying for by his proposed 20% tariff on Mexican goods. Also I think he just increased spending on the military budget so ya don't know where this money is coming from. Then he was elected by the decent chunk of Americans who are afraid of brown people (not all Trump supporters are but you can't deny these people are among his supporters) so he had to do something after all his rants and promises in the years before the election so he has a completely stupid travel ban that literally does absolutely nothing but appease some of his voter base, make us look bad to the rest of the world, cause domestic strain among our people, and really make ISIS feel like they got a small victory. It did not make the country any safer, if I have to explain why you aren't bright enough to even argue with. It was completely pointless as he planned to get nothin accomplished during the travel ban but broadly make the vetting process more rigorous - that's more government dollars out the window on a already string and rigorous vetting system (how many refugee terrorist attacks have we had?) I could go on but I'm tired and I probably have some wrong info ^ cause it's so late. It's also highly unlikely anyone on the flood actually reads these long posts so ya. Also he's a compulsive liar with the most fragile ego I've ever seen on such a prominent figure. I just can't see this going well for making deals and foreign policy. TL;DR His trade policy is going to slow our economic growth so dramatically that it will over shadow any stimulation his tax cuts bring. His tax cuts are poorly thought out and he has no chance of maintaining a balanced budget with his proposals. Then he's going on to increase government spending in several sectors some of which are a complete waste just to appease some simple minded voters (the wall and travel ban) Obama was also pretty shitty with the cluster -blam!- mess of Obamacare for starters

I don't know if he's a bad president. His story is just beginning. But I can say that I'm rooting like hell for the man. Because he's our president and his choices directly affect my family. So, yeah.. I want to see every nay-sayer cry into their blouses as Trump leads this country into the greatest 8 years in the history of this nation. I want him to go down as the greatest president of all time. Unfortunately, what I can also say is that I haven't seen anything up to this point that leads me to believe that will be the case. At all. But he's got nearly 4 more years to change my mind.

One thing is the travel ban Overall, it was just poorly implemented/enforced The Yemen raid. First, it had little intelligence to proceed said raid. One navy seal is killed alongside civilians. Trump says although there were casualties, more than he hoped so, it was still a success. How come now he says it's a failure and blamed it on his generals (and I have heard Obama administration too?). That doesn't make any sense, honestly His judgement is questionable at best. He has done some good, true Crackdown on human trafficking (there was a big operation that jailed hundreds of adults) Speaking of Sweden (its not a war zone like some people have exaggerated, but it is definitely not a perfect country that shows multiculturalism works neither)

He ran in my lobby

I support him, but I disagree with a few of his cabinet choices, mainly DeVos and Perry, and also disagree with Stephen Bannon. I don't agree with his wall proposition. I didn't like his travel ban, at all. Mainly due to the discriminatory reasons behind it, which are pretty evident. However, I do like his recent comments on immigration and thought they were a good compromise between republicans and democrats.