{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/8/2016 9:06:59 PM
1
You're missing the point. The nighthawk argument is to show that the shield is broken. Why should a shield you get from sprinting tank a super? Should flame shield tank fist of havoc then?
English
-
Feet, it can very well die, use skill and adapt
-
Again, missing the point.
-
How so?
-
If you don't see how you're missing the point, Then you have too much tunnel vision for me to explain it to you (even though I already did). I'm not going to bother. And you never answered my question. Should flame shield tank fist of havoc?
-
It seems like your inability to explain and then saying I have tunnel vision is proof you can't support your case. And a blah tanking a slam is an opinion and varies upon user so my input wouldn't prove anything for you or me.
-
Editado por StrictlyTy: 12/8/2016 10:08:08 PMAnswer the question. Should flame shield tank fist of havoc.
-
Well that depends, if they make it counterable, sure. If not no. I'd not be okay with jug if it wasn't counterable, but the thing is it is.
-
What if you had to use death from above and hit the directly on the head? Countable? sure. Waste of time and a perk slot? Definitely. But then again you could just A: adapt B: wast a super or C: not play
-
Well landing on the head would only mean one kill, if you give away that still gives it its full potential then I'm fine with whatever.
-
But it's still counter-able. Exactly what you ask for
-
You see, with the golden gun scenario you still keep your full potential relying on you after you counter. You don't keep you full potential if you slam on a head.
-
See this is the problem with your argument. You think the existence of a counter means something is fine as is. I'd go into it more but it's not even worth it since its more than likely getting changed in the next patch. You can go away now.
-
Also, I don't see what's wrong with my argument, it makes you play a bit differently and supports smarter play. I don't see what's wrong.
-
Of course you don't. That's why I'm done arguing with you.
-
I have read this entire feed and just wow....
-
Seems like someone just can't admit they're wrong. :)
-
[quote]Seems like someone just can't admit they're wrong[/quote] That statement is ironic. [quote]And you can learn to counter[/quote] I usually don't stat check when replying to people, but it's funny you say this because I'm objectively a better player than you. Jug not having a counter isn't the issue. Jug being able to tank a super in highly likely circumstance is the issue. But again, you've missed that point. So yeah.
-
As I like to say [spoiler]get gud[/spoiler]
-
I don't read spoilers.
-
Salt, I taste it
-
And you can learn to counter :)
