{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/15/2016 2:34:43 AM
136
All those other games you listed have very low graphics.
Bungie has very high graphics ,that is why it runs lower.
English
-
What?lol
-
If you cant read english it is not my fault.
-
Destiny is a 30fps game two years old with low graphic cause it was made for ps3 and xbox360. Now tell me.. How stupid you are?
-
CS has lower graphics. Overwatch has lower graphics. Now tell me how stupid are you.
-
Editado por Vellither: 11/16/2016 1:09:56 PMOh god you are a stupid fan boy of destiny ppl like you are the problem in this game. Again 30fps vs 60fps game. P2p servers with 10 ticks vs Dedicated servers with 20-30-60-120! ticks. If you DONT know dont speak. Graphic are not the reason why destiny run so low is the net code and again the garphic in destiny are VERY LOW.
-
People like you are the problem here. You werent following the conversation. You just replied . Destiny has bad servers because pvp was added at the last second. Next time..try reading.
-
Destiny servers? Lol.
-
Yeh that was his mistake.
-
Again if you dont know. Dont speak.
-
You are the one that dont know. And a little kid fanboy by your way of speaking.
-
This is one of the poorest excuses I've heard. The Destiny engine has extremely average graphical fidelity. The textures are nothing special, the particle effects are minimal, there are few dynamic or destructible elemets. The art team is fantastic and they do great work given the very run of the mill graphic engine, but great graphics Destiny does not have. Graphics aren't the same as looking good. Destiny is quite simply, a technically outdated game with regards to everything besides matchmaking. The game uses the same outdated structure from Halo: Reach which is the same structure used from Halo 3. There is zero reason for a modern shooter to not only have a server tic rate of 10, but also use dated p2p connections, while also using sbmm rendering it redundant, while not having dedicated servers, while [b]ALSO[/b] only running at 30fps. If Battlefield can finally do it, any big budget game can. Destiny 2 should, at the very least, be on par with CoD given they are both Activision properties. No excuses.
-
You forgot destiny wasnt going to be a pvp game. It was going to be PvE. Pvp was added at the last moment.
-
That's not my point. There's also little evidence to support that claim unlike many of the other rumors.
-
Bungie said so themselves in an interview before it released the beta.
-
They did not. Competitive multiplayer was mentioned as far back as February 2013, long before the restructuring. They said that it had a bigger focus later in development. Not the same.
-
That is the same. If you cant see that. Dont reply back
-
Please explain to me how giving a design pillar that had already existed within the game more focus later in development means that it wasn't a design pillar at all. You realize that regardless of if pvp was already planned or was added last minute it would still be in the later part of development right? Hence why it's a [b]primarily[/b] pve game. Always was, still is. Pvp was in development long before 2014 and you have no ground to defend them. At the end of the day, the fact is that the game [b]does[/b] have pvp. It's an important part of the game and it is technically outdated in every way.
-
So i was still right. Pvp was not their primairy focus. Have a nice day.
-
No one even argued that with you nor anyone else. If you recall, we were talking about how there is no excuse for how poor Destiny is on a technical level. I was also disproving your remark that pvp had been added on last minute. You still lack the ability to justify your defensiveness. Though since you're apparently trying to change the subject, pvp not being the key focus doesn't render it's impact, importance, and large player base pointless. Bungie likely just didn't pay any attention to how outdated their competitive multiplayer was during development.
-
The graphics are actually very similar to black ops 3s. The difference is bo3 runs at 60 fps and destiny can't even hit 30 in most areas. Not to mention the static effect that's over you screen at all times that can get really -blam!-ing annoying.
-
You are extremely generous. Test my experience: run Sunsinger, go to any group of 4+ thralls, activate Super and spam grenades until exhausted; watch the enemy stutter as your GPU struggles to keep frame rates above 10! Destiny is very graphics intense I've. Now, do the same in PVP and you will quickly see your screen stall. Add P2P lag and there you are! Welcome to Destiny...
-
I think you meant to reply to the other guy
-
Thanks, didn't think anyone would read it anyway. Thanks anyway.
-
I have no static effect on my screen whatsoever. Must be a ps 4 thing.
-
I experienced it on xbox 360 and ps4, hard to notice on a TV but is very apparent on a monitor, if you look for it you'll see it.
