{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/25/2016 7:33:58 PM
7
-
Where is all the anti-matter?
-
This seems harder than a 5, but I can take it. There are a few theories about where all the antimatter has gone, like the Kaon theory, or the theory that antimatter might have anti-gravity which would mean matter an antimatter repel each other. There's so a theory that two populations of opposite particles avoided their fatal grasp and that their might by anti-stars and anti-galaxies out there somewhere. A simpler answer however is that we just don't know yet.
-
[quote] the theory that antimatter might have anti-gravity which would mean matter an antimatter repel each other. [/quote] You can't seriously think that, right? Lol, do you know what anti-matter is? [quote] There's so a theory that two populations of opposite particles avoided their fatal grasp and that their might by anti-stars and anti-galaxies out there somewhere. [/quote] Except there isn't enough anti-matter to form complex composite matter.
-
Editado por Moon-Eye_Maddox: 8/26/2016 6:23:12 AMIt's possible that antimatter does not interact with gravity in the same way that matter does, in other words, antimatter might "fall up." As far as anyone has been able to tell though, the differences between matter and antimatter are confined to interactions involving the weak nuclear force, so the "anti-gravity" theory is just one of the more outlandish theories.
-
Editado por The Cellar Door: 8/26/2016 6:34:01 AMWhat the -blam!- are you talking about dude? If you don't know, it's alright man, nobody is pressuring you to know this shit. Anti-matter is literally the same thing as matter, just with an opposite charge. Lol. It isn't affected differently by gravity, and if it was, that would be a severe violation of physical law. And what differences? Weak force interactions create virtual anti-particles, if that's what you mean.
-
Editado por Moon-Eye_Maddox: 8/26/2016 6:39:47 AMIt's not like I came up with the theory. You asked where all the antimatter was and I stated theories that try to explain it. Some are outlandish, others make more sense. Here are a few articles that talk about the "anti-gravity" theory in case you had never heard of it: http://www.universetoday.com/116406/wheres-all-the-antimatter/ http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2014/11/does-antimatter-fall-up-or-down/ At any rate, like I said before, no one knows yet where all the antimatter is, no one theory has sufficiently explained where it all went.
-
Well, the theories you presented were more over baseless speculation as to the reason why CP-violation occurred in the early universe, not where the antimatter is. The question I asked was more of a trick question, because the antimatter didn't go anywhere, it was simply annihilated. There ended up being less antimatter than matter (CP-Violation), and so following pair annihilation, you have a surplus of matter, therefor our universe is made out of matter. Physical law strictly prohibits "anti-gravity" in more ways than one and there has not been a single shred of evidence to support it. It's just pop-sci speculation. What we don't know is why this imbalance existed, but we know it did, and we know what occurred due to it.
