Fallout 4 theory:
They half assed the game, expected everybody to love it, when it was only mediocre they stopped trying in dlc content and planned to phase the game out within one year of its release.
[spoiler]but hey, [i]its just a theory![/i][/spoiler]
English
-
I can respect your opinion. I myself didn't enjoy Fallout 3 that much, it caused me not to try New Vegas. I've enjoyed Fallout 4 quite a bit though. Maybe I'll go back and try 3 again and see how i feel. Some things about it just bother me.
-
It all depends on what you're looking for with the game. If you base some of your opinion on the gunplay, you're definitely going to be disappointed with FO3 and NV, but once again in my opinion, the quests are better, the dialogue is much better, your character feels much more alive without a voice.
-
See i didn't play New Vegas so i won't judge it for no reason. But with Fallout 3 i never felt like i actually was the protagonist or like what i did actually made a difference in the world. Then the karma system was rather pointless. I don't think fallout 3 was bad, but at the time it wasn't for me. Fallout 4 also suffers from the protagonist part, but it's not nearly as bad. They also got rid of the karma system which I'm fine with since i found it useless. I did prefer it being dialogue lines (though the voice actors did a great job nonetheless).
-
Personally I liked the karma system, it made your choices affect how people saw you. I feel like I'm FO4, the only people who care are people in your faction and companions. Everyone else doesn't care, and most of your evil choices don't make much of a difference anywhere.
-
Closed the application after the 5th code building sequence. How f-cking stupid was that part??
-
I enjoyed it a tiny bit, it somehow reminded me of portal(dunno why) and I really want a third one of those, so I didn't hate that part too much.
-
>Opinions. [spoiler]I personally enjoyed it.[/spoiler]
-
Of course, I did as well, but I didn't enjoy it nearly as much as I had enjoyed previous fallout games. It was fun to play, but when you're looking for things that 3 and NV had, you'll be disappointed.
-
Thought the same. Then I made a new character on survival mode three weeks ago. Haven't played a game besides fallout since. Survival forces you to really learn everything in the game. They did not half ass it at all. It's phenomenal. At least to me.
-
I still feel as though it's a shallow game in what's in it. Yes there may be more mechanics(or less depending on how you look at it {ammo crafting, weapon/armor deteriorating}) I feel like many locations are absolutely worthless and empty in the game. There is one location in downtown Boston where it's the entrance to a big building, and all that's in it is a few super mutants in one tiny lobby cell. Nothing else to it, nothing special about it, just a waste of a location marker. There are countless times where I had found a new location and hoped for something cool to happen, and nothing would, or it'd just be some ghouls or raiders or something. The greatest example (in my opinion) of this is the underground bunker in the cabin out in the glowing sea. It's a massive underground station with multiple floors and the potential for mystery or discovery, and at the end it's just a couple of synths and sometimes some power armor. That's it. It could've put you on some big mystery quest to find an old weapon or reactivate it to power some of the commonwealth, but [i]nooo[/i], it just had to have 6 synths and some power armor.
-
I get what you're saying, but I remember a lot of those places being in fo3 and nv too. At least there's no god awful metro. My biggest gripe of any fallout was the damn metro system that you had to use so often in fo3. It was so bland...
-
I've played both and personally NV was my least favorite. Not to say it was bad I still enjoyed it.
-
Compared to other fallout games, OP is using facts.
-
He's using opinions bud.
-
-
[quote]facts[/quote]
-
-
A game theory
-
Thanks for watching.
-
Subscribe for new videos every week