{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Editado por SwedishViking02:
6/14/2016 4:06:40 PM
26
Look at it like this, people kill people but people say guns kill people becouse guns make it so much easier. I live in Sweden so ill use an example from here. That sword man who killed immigrants at a school, he did only kill a few students becouse they ran away. Now if he had a gun instead of a sword he would have been able to kill many more. Its no coincidence that USA has had many more school shootings than countries where guns are banned.
That singer at the concert might have been saved with anti gun laws since its much harder running up to someone and stabbing them than it is pulling a trigger from 30 yards. This is why guns are bad. They make it so easy to kill.
Guns dont kill people people kill people but guns make it a hell of a lot easier.
Edit: Wow im suprised how many angry gun nuts there are on b.net
English
-
>goes to hardware store >buys lead pipe and some pipe caps >goes to bank changes 2$ into pennies >buys gun powder >fills lead pipe with gunpowder and pennies >attaches some sort of fuse or remote >leaves >detonate bombs scattered across busy area >no one knows because I'm already 30 miles away >repeat Guns aren't required to kill on a massive scale, if someone wants to kill like that a gun law will not stop them.
-
You're probably on a FBI watch list now
-
Puts you on one as well for association ;)
-
Yeah but atleast half of all shootings could be stopped if Killing people wasnt so easy with a gun.
-
And those shootings would turn into stabbings or bombings, which are much more gruesome.
-
You can kill 20 people in 60s with an automatic rifle or a gun but stabbing someone is a lot slower and harder since you have to get close.
-
Automatic rifles are illegal to own in America w/o proper licensing and certification
-
And you can kill 100 people in 5 seconds with a bomb. Just because guns are gone doesn't mean crime will go down with it. Criminals will still find a way to kill people if they are determined enough.
-
He is 13 logic doesn't work
-
Yeah becouse every mad person has acces to bomb schematics and materials
-
[quote]>goes to hardware store >buys lead pipe and some pipe caps >goes to bank changes 2$ into pennies >buys gun powder >fills lead pipe with gunpowder and pennies >attaches some sort of fuse or remote >leaves >detonate bombs scattered across busy area >no one knows because I'm already 30 miles away >repeat Guns aren't required to kill on a massive scale, if someone wants to kill like that a gun law will not stop them.[/quote]
-
[quote]Yeah but atleast half of all shootings could be stopped if Killing people wasnt so easy with a gun.[/quote] Because logic
-
Yeah criminals who shoot up places do it becouse they have guns. Nobody is stupid enough to try to mass murder people with a knife so no guns means less mass murders since criminals will have to be more carefull when they only have knifes get it now?
-
Because criminals follow laws? What are you gonna do about the border? Banning guns creates a black market for firearms Cartels already bring in heroin/ cocaine and sex trade, what's to stop them from bringing firearms? Are you gonna stab the person robbing you at gun point? Be careful you don't say anything about border security, you don't want to be labeled a racist biggot
-
Im not talking about the diehard mafia criminals im talking about the school students who are mad and decide to for example shoot up their school. I dont think those people would turn to the black market to get guns.
-
If a school student has a gun (under 18yrs old) it's already illegal
-
Yes but without gun laws they can easily take their parents guns thats how most school shootings happen
-
Without what gun laws? How about conceal carry for teachers and staff with a required 6month psych evaluation
-
This makes no sense.
-
What makes no sense? Your life [spoiler]Edgy af[/spoiler]
-
Editado por Krispy Kreme Il: 6/14/2016 3:08:00 PM(The moment you realize you're having a conversation with a 12 year old) Good day sir
-
13 years old, cheers m8
-
There are enough ways that can go horribly wrong that make it considerably less effective, though. You muck up, bomb kills you. You screw one step up, bomb fails. Etc.
-
So the only thing that would stop that are user errors, say someone with experience decides to do it what then ? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Marathon_bombing Pressure cookers and a 9mm pistol
-
Remember, though. Those bombs caused only 3 fatalities. Tons of injuries, lots of chaos, but only 3 deaths. Bombs and explosives are, by nature, more capable of injury rather than death. Also, it's not just user error. They are easily stopped by, say, someone just happening to remove the bag, or someone suspecting it and evacuating, etc.
