-
AHHHHHH! [spoiler]CONTROVERSY[/spoiler]
-
There is evidence that he existed, just not evidence about the religion he followed exactly...
-
If he didn't exist then why was Christianity formed? The apostles existed and they all risked their lives to spread the message of peace. All of them thought Jesus was real. Even if he did miracles or not, he existed. Just wanna throw that out there.
-
Honestly you can't prove science or math. Nor can you prove religion. All paths are created by humans to make life easier at the time and should be respected.
-
Uh, yes you can.
-
I do respect religious people. So long as they don't shove it in my face, that is.
-
That really goes for anything as well. Opinions, mcdonalds, ideologies (opinions still).
-
Pretty much, yeah.
-
What about atheists who shove it in people's faces? Or feel the need to proclaim how atheist they are?
-
You can't prove science? I disagree man, that's the whole point
-
But he did
-
But he didn't though. There's no evidence.
-
The bible idiot
-
That isn't proof.
-
Jesus did live wether he was the son of God is preference to your belief
-
Then the Quran must also be fact by that logic.
-
Theres this thing called faith...
-
Faith is not evidence. It's actually the exact opposite. There's no proof that God or Heaven exist, but faith is you believing in it anyway.
-
Thats my point. The religion is based around faith, not proof.
-
Editado por auragamee: 4/25/2016 10:53:34 AMI may have thought you were responding to someone else, my bad. There's no "@______" on replies. Edit: on mobile, anyways.
-
O np Misunderstandings happen
-
Editado por EnemyNotFound: 4/25/2016 1:02:00 AMThank you.
-
The lack of evidence arguing one side does not automatically mean it is false when the other side lacks evidence as well.
-
-
Not a knife. No edge.