{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/10/2016 10:19:21 AM
51
I don't care what point you're trying to make, all I have to say is: LOOOOOOL.
COSMETICS -
2.
[b]cosmetics, superficial measures to make something appear better, more attractive, or more impressive[/b]:
[i]The budget committee opted for cosmetics instead of a serious urban renewal plan.[/i]
It's armor and also 3 LL. The infusion system has been modified to ensure whiney gamers get the LL they desire. You will never hear the "forever 319" chants after April 12th. Raid Challenges drop weaponry and gear at the highest light it rewards, which is obvious but I felt it necessary to remind. OP, your post was ignorant and premature. Perhaps juvenile.
Good day, Guardian
English
-
What about the reputation boosters? idiot thinks he can prove people wrong :)
-
[quote]I don't care what point you're trying to make, all I have to say is: LOOOOOOL. [/quote] Great way to make anyone think anything you have to say is actually relevant. [quote]COSMETICS - 2. [b]cosmetics, superficial measures to make something appear better, more attractive, or more impressive[/b]: [i]The budget committee opted for cosmetics instead of a serious urban renewal plan.[/i] [/quote] Exactly. Maybe you u didn't know this... So really quick. Go look at the armor you are wearing. They have perks on them. They also have intellect, discipline, and strength. Each peice of armor has different perks and amounts of intellect, strength, and discipline. That being said, you could simply pay money until you get the perfect roll for your playstyle. This would then give you an advantage over others that could not afford to pay all of that money to get their perfect rolls. [quote]It's armor and also 3 LL. The infusion system has been modified to ensure whiney gamers get the LL they desire.[/quote] So first you say that it is only 3 LL. Then follow it up acknowledging that you already know they tweaked the infusion system allowing those items to be instantly maxed out? Kind of counterproductive... But thanks for making it easy. [quote]You will never hear the "forever 319" chants after April 12th. Raid Challenges drop weaponry and gear at the highest light it rewards,[/quote] This is true, and it is also a good thing. [quote]which is obvious but I felt it necessary to remind. OP, your post was ignorant and premature. Perhaps juvenile. [/quote] Really? OP makes a hell of a lot more sense than your nonsense post. Good day, Guardian
-
Wow You would do all that for some spec'd armor that could drop in game?
-
Editado por Gu1TaRpuNk41: 4/12/2016 12:36:15 PM[quote]Wow You would do all that for some spec'd armor that could drop in game?[/quote] Nope, and anyone that does is in my opinion, pathetic. But the Original post was simply stating that Bungie Lied to us. Which they did. Also, selling items that have perks will lead to other undesirable impacts on destiny... But no one seems to see it. Everyone just keeps sticking up for the company that continues to tell us lies. Fact: When eververse first came out, they said they would only sell cosmetic items. Fact: since armor has perks... That makes it more than cosmetic. The point is what is going to come next? They lied to our faces, and to quote the original post, "what will we be doing by the time Destiny 2 comes out? Will we have to pay for energy to -blam!-ing play crucible matches?"
-
No. Perks in crucible do very minimal effort. Or you barely notice them working to begin with. So tell me what the problem is if someone spends 300 to look cool but still isn't good?
-
[quote]No. Perks in crucible do very minimal effort. [/quote] Good job of contradicting yourself. First you say No. Then you acknowledge that the gear has perks. Thanks for enforcing exactly what I said. [quote]Or you barely notice them working to begin with.[/quote] But they are still there. For example, remember doing hard mode crota (when it first came out) without having a helmet that regenerated your health by picking up an orb? I know it was still doable without it, but you definitely had an [b]advantage[/b] if you had one. [quote]So tell me what the problem is if someone spends 300 to look cool but still isn't good?[/quote] There is absolutely nothing wrong with spending money for [b]cosmetic[/b] items. But you even proved with your reply that eververse is not going to be selling strictly cosmetic items anymore. I will paste this here again: what will we be doing by the time Destiny 2 comes out? Will we have to pay for energy to -blam!-ing play crucible matches?
-
Then stop playing if all you're going to do is break down and analyze what everyone says the wrong way. There is no contradiction in acknowledging there are perks , but also believing there is barely noticeable effect.
-
Editado por Gu1TaRpuNk41: 4/12/2016 1:02:48 PM[quote]Then stop playing if all you're going to do is break down and analyze what everyone says the wrong way. [/quote] Actually, you should stop playing, because you neglect to see that the events occurring are going to have a negative effect on destiny in the future. All I am doing to make it known that if Bungie keeps going the path of microtransactions, destiny will eventually be comparable to a cell phone game. Sorry for actually giving a crap. [quote]There is no contradiction in acknowledging there are perks , but also believing there is barely noticeable effect.[/quote] So why are you even arguing me? Bottom line, all I have been saying is that Bungie lied. That they said they would only sell cosmetic. You said "there is no contradiction in acknowledging there are perks." which would make the fact that they are selling items with perks, go back on what they originally said about eververse... Also: "there is barely noticeable effect" "there is [b]barely[/b] noticeable effect" "there is [b][i]barely[/i][/b] noticeable effect" "there is [b][i][u]barely[/u][/i][/b] noticeable effect" There is no contradiction in acknowledging there are perks.
-
Have you seen yourself? You believe that bungie will start handing out flawless cards because people pay real world money for it. You're horrible respect for anyone has made them stop talking to you. Bad troll
-
Editado por Gu1TaRpuNk41: 4/12/2016 1:28:54 PM[quote]Have you seen yourself? [/quote] So far all you have done is prove my points. [quote]You believe that bungie will start handing out flawless cards because people pay real world money for it.[/quote] Exactly where did I say anything like this? Exactly. [quote]You're horrible respect for anyone has made them stop talking to you. [/quote] I have done nothing except state facts and point out how people prove my points in their arguments. [quote]Bad troll[/quote] Lol trolls don't state facts not my fault you can't comprehend that you have been lied to. PS: Call of duty started off with microtransactions comparable to this. Buy packs that give you weapons already available in the game. Just like the armor eververse will/did sell. Fun fact. Now the same COD game has weapons that can literally only be obtained by purchasing them. For example, SRL. Purchasing the record book was literally the only way to obtain that particular racing armor. (Which simply shows that destiny has already made items that can only be obtained with silver.) Next your going to think, well just because that happened in COD, it won't in destiny. They are both Activision. They are both the same company. It is not as far fetched as you think. By everyone excepting what they are currently doing, in the future you can expect to see weapons and/or armor that can only be obtained from silver purchases. It is a slippery slope, and it appears destiny has already started to slip. Take note that the following article is even on a mobile website. http://www.gottabemobile.com/2016/02/11/new-black-ops-3-weapons-in-supply-drops-are-unacceptable/
-
Editado por Michael Vick: 4/12/2016 1:31:56 PMLol no You don't ask questions. You're assuming again. It's not that I don't understand. It's that I could careless what someone pays to feel to win. [spoiler]anyone else want a turn at this brick wall?[/spoiler]
-
[quote]Lol no [/quote] No what? No is not a relevant answer for anything in the previous post? [quote]You don't ask questions. You're assuming again.[/quote] When did I say I ask questions? What exactly am I assuming? [quote][spoiler]anyone else want a turn at this brick wall?[/spoiler] [/quote] Considering your response makes no sense at all maybe you actually should start turning at walls... There may have been some serious damage done.
-
Lol no Stop lol just no Lol no stop lol Just stop lol [spoiler]no[/spoiler]
-
[quote]Lol no Stop lol just no Lol no stop lol Just stop lol [spoiler]no[/spoiler][/quote] Ahhh I was correct. Brain Damage. Explains alot.
-
-
[quote]Lol no[/quote] It's so funny how in these forums whenever you continue to state facts to people they eventually start spewing nonsense. You can always tell when someone isn't man enough to admit someone else is correct. Good job little girl.
-
Lol no just no dude We're clearly on different sides But yeah let's keep going because why not? [spoiler]do you just want to keep going?[/spoiler]
-
[quote]Lol no just no dude We're clearly on different sides But yeah let's keep going because why not? [spoiler]do you just want to keep going?[/spoiler][/quote] Actually yes. I asked you questions. You started spewing literal nonsense. Which is what someone would do when they can't answer said questions. This is the post that you replied with a series of the word "No" instead of simply answering my questions. [quote][quote]Lol no [/quote] No what? No is not a relevant answer for anything in the previous post? [quote]You don't ask questions. You're assuming again.[/quote] When did I say I ask questions? What exactly am I assuming? [quote][spoiler]anyone else want a turn at this brick wall?[/spoiler] [/quote] Considering your response makes no sense at all maybe you actually should start turning at walls... There may have been some serious damage done.[/quote]
-
I did plenty of times. You just didn't want to comprehend it So lol no
-
[quote]I did plenty of times. You just didn't want to comprehend it So lol no[/quote] 1 more time won't hurt.
-
Lol just no [spoiler]im the little girl but you're still arguing about [b]cosmetics[/b][/spoiler]
-
[quote]Lol just no [spoiler]im the little girl but you're still arguing about [b]cosmetics[/b][/spoiler][/quote] Since you apparently don't know it... I will make it simple for you. Copied from the Oxford English Dictionary : [quote]Definition of cosmetic in English: cosmetic Pronunciation: /käzˈmedik/ ADJECTIVE 1Involving or relating to treatment intended to restore or improve a person’s appearance: cosmetic surgery More example sentences 1.1Designed or serving to improve the appearance of the body, especially the face: lens designs can improve the cosmetic effect of your glasses More example sentences 1.2Affecting only the appearance of something rather than its substance: the reform package was merely a cosmetic exercise[/quote] [spoiler]http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/cosmetic[/spoiler] You said yourself: there is no arguing the armor has perks. By definition, something with perks is not cosmetic. I was, and still am stating fact. Feel free to continue come back and say whatever nonsense you can come up with to say that bungie did not lie.
-
Lol no I didn't say that
-
Editado por Gu1TaRpuNk41: 4/12/2016 3:35:57 PM[quote]Lol no I didn't say that[/quote] Sorry, you said, "There is no contradiction in acknowledging there are perks" Which also means exactly what I said. there is no arguing that armor has perks. If it means anything different feel free to fill me in on that.
-
Lol no just no
