Never said firing the CEO is because the community complained. I said by replacing him with his right hand guy, how do they think the perception of their handling of the game is going to change? As opposed to hiring an outside person, someone with a different experience to really shake up the studio, why would they want a change, only to replace that person with someone who's not going to change much? Activision and the board do not care what the community thinks about the CEO, they care about the dollars. And the dollars, and a direct correlation to the buyers enthusiasm for the game right now. But if I had to take a guess as to why he was fired, I would say it's a culmination of bad decisions around the game that resulted in (1) a year delay (2) lawsuits from former employees (3) unfinished vanilla game, which resulted in the 2 DLC packs (4) a money model switch to smaller events and micro transactions, that probably hasn't produced the amount of money they envisioned (5) the Destiny 2 delay that has been rumored, which will most likely turn out to be true